Timeline for Investigators unknowingly destroy evidence – coincidence or irony?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2019 at 7:25 | history | edited | Mari-Lou A | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
spelling
|
| S Oct 25, 2018 at 10:21 | history | suggested | Toby Speight | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
More distinct title; link to book summary, and fix some grammar
|
| Oct 25, 2018 at 8:07 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 25, 2018 at 10:21 | |||||
| Oct 25, 2018 at 8:03 | comment | added | Toby Speight | It's what we call delicious irony <gd&r> | |
| Oct 24, 2018 at 22:38 | comment | added | Jay S. | I appreciate the help :) | |
| Oct 24, 2018 at 22:29 | answer | added | SpencerWinter | timeline score: 5 | |
| Oct 24, 2018 at 22:15 | comment | added | Weather Vane | It certainly was not a coincidence. And it was not ironic. As far as I recall this story the murder weapon was a frozen leg of lamb, and the murderer intended the evidence to be eaten. | |
| Oct 24, 2018 at 22:15 | review | First posts | |||
| Oct 25, 2018 at 8:08 | |||||
| Oct 24, 2018 at 22:13 | history | asked | Jay S. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |