Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 30, 2020 at 22:21 comment added Ed999 Hollywood song writer Irving Berlin, composing song lyrics in 1943, could not possibly have known any of the technical details of Allied proximity fuses used in World War 2, because all such devices were classified top secret. Nor, more importantly, could movie audiences have known about the classified details of those fuses. Therefore, including a reference to such devices in a song would make no sense. So whatever the lyrics in that song refer to, this cannot be a reference to a secret military development about which the movie-going public knew nothing.
Jun 9, 2018 at 20:35 vote accept Quuxplusone
May 26, 2018 at 17:21 history edited Quuxplusone CC BY-SA 4.0
add ngram link
May 26, 2018 at 9:01 comment added J. Taylor @Phil Sweet ...acoustic triggers did "wire for sound", but, were passive devices, and, most importantly, were extremely secret. any certain reference to such a device in a song would have had the song writer and performer in detention.
May 26, 2018 at 1:45 comment added Phil Sweet Irving Berlin's reference is pretty straight forward. Acoustic triggers were one type of proximity fuse. "The British used a Rochelle salt microphone and a piezoelectric device to trigger a relay to detonate the projectile or bomb's explosive."
May 26, 2018 at 0:19 comment added Jason Bassford To me, the use of wired for sound is simply an expression that means built for noise. Just as in the case of the "newfangled talkies," so to in the case of the bomb—which is going to make a large noise. Or a baby that's "wired for sound" to keep you up at night . . .
May 25, 2018 at 20:42 answer added eSurfsnake timeline score: 0
May 25, 2018 at 19:32 history tweeted twitter.com/StackEnglish/status/1000097401498210304
May 25, 2018 at 18:39 answer added J. Taylor timeline score: 2
May 25, 2018 at 17:38 history asked Quuxplusone CC BY-SA 4.0