Timeline for Is there an adjective for people who work poorly together?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
31 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2016 at 17:42 | answer | added | newt | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 16, 2016 at 17:08 | answer | added | mathreadler | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 16, 2016 at 14:57 | comment | added | Michael Benjamin | The project was delivered late because the workers assigned to the task didn't get along. It was a dysfunctional team. | |
| Dec 16, 2016 at 2:21 | vote | accept | blackstone | ||
| Dec 16, 2016 at 1:59 | answer | added | Benjamin | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 16, 2016 at 1:40 | history | protected | user140086 | ||
| Dec 15, 2016 at 23:12 | answer | added | Great Productions | timeline score: 0 | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 16:10 | answer | added | hawkeyegold | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 15:49 | answer | added | paddotk | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 15:42 | answer | added | RML | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 14:29 | answer | added | alwayslearning | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 11:53 | answer | added | Vikrant | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 10:58 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackEnglish/status/809351905755430912 | ||
| Dec 15, 2016 at 10:13 | comment | added | Mawg | "a group of people who don't get along, who work poorly together, who don't necessarily like each other" are "mismatched", although tthat does not fit well with your example sentence. | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 9:57 | history | edited | k1eran | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
add formatting
|
| Dec 15, 2016 at 9:39 | comment | added | Ben | There is nothing wrong with using antagonistic for this. | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 9:01 | answer | added | Joce | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 15, 2016 at 4:14 | answer | added | Richard Kayser | timeline score: 10 | |
| Dec 14, 2016 at 23:14 | comment | added | k1eran | It you didn't mind a phrase: team members who didn't gel caused ... | |
| Dec 14, 2016 at 23:00 | comment | added | Mazura | Was it due to incompetence, tactical ploy, personality conflicts, "does not work well with others" or "does not participate"? The adjective for all of these is either (soon to be) unemployed or related (to the boss ;) | |
| Dec 14, 2016 at 21:32 | answer | added | k1eran | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 14, 2016 at 21:00 | answer | added | Phil Sweet | timeline score: 28 | |
| Dec 14, 2016 at 20:57 | answer | added | ab2 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Dec 14, 2016 at 20:40 | answer | added | MonkeyZeus | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 14, 2016 at 19:52 | answer | added | Cascabel_StandWithUkraine_ | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 14, 2016 at 19:01 | answer | added | Mick | timeline score: 11 | |
| Dec 14, 2016 at 18:57 | comment | added | Dan Bron | Like oil and water, Bob and Joe are immiscible. | |
| Dec 14, 2016 at 18:47 | answer | added | bib | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 14, 2016 at 18:22 | answer | added | cobaltduck | timeline score: 29 | |
| Dec 14, 2016 at 18:18 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 14, 2016 at 18:42 | |||||
| Dec 14, 2016 at 18:16 | history | asked | blackstone | CC BY-SA 3.0 |