Skip to main content
12 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 15, 2020 at 7:40 history edited CommunityBot
Commonmark migration
Sep 8, 2016 at 22:16 history edited FumbleFingers CC BY-SA 3.0
added 813 characters in body
Sep 8, 2016 at 22:05 comment added FumbleFingers @Spagirl: Interesting! I've got the 12th edition in paper, and it's there too. I didn't realise Chambers had free online access, but I just searched, and there it is. I'm in a bit of a quandary now...
Sep 8, 2016 at 21:54 comment added Spagirl Chambers gives 'Now for' and 'Off we go for' as definitions of 'Hey for'. No link as I'm using a phone app Chambers.
Sep 8, 2016 at 19:14 comment added Andrew Leach Well, if Conan Doyle isn't a match for Shakespeare or Spenser, what hope O'Brian?
Sep 8, 2016 at 18:10 comment added FumbleFingers ...here's another instance, from Sir Arthur Conan Doyle no less: Then hey for home, and no more hawking today! Given the status of writers using it, I'm a bit surprised the full OED hasn't seen fit to define the usage. Especially when they sometimes list words that have only ever occurred once (from Shakespeare or Spenser, for example).
Sep 8, 2016 at 18:02 history edited FumbleFingers CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 141 characters in body
Sep 8, 2016 at 18:01 comment added FumbleFingers @Andrew Leach: Ah, right! I didn't give it too much thought, but somehow I had the idea he was a fantasy writer. I think I'd better delete that last sentence (and fix the spellings! :)
Sep 8, 2016 at 17:57 comment added Andrew Leach Actually O'Brian (not O'Brien, oops: I should have corrected that!) writes about Navy life in the Napoleonic Wars, so it's entirely possible that he does want to sound archaic.
Sep 8, 2016 at 17:43 history edited FumbleFingers CC BY-SA 3.0
added 394 characters in body
Sep 8, 2016 at 17:05 history edited FumbleFingers CC BY-SA 3.0
added 441 characters in body
Sep 8, 2016 at 16:59 history answered FumbleFingers CC BY-SA 3.0