3 deleted 222 characters in body
source | link

Depending on the type of content you want to classify, Classicalclassical thinking can be opposed to "fresh" thinking, it has more positive connotations that dusty old. Current thinking/opinion can be used to describe the current mainstream (it is in fact the name of a series of scientific journals publishing reviews, e.g. Current opinion on cell biology)

EDIT: I see now that I read your post too quickly and that you forgot a comma between "fresh" and thinking! You should indicate what type of content you are classifyingso it is not deprecated but isn't novel either.

Still,So you could have categories as : Fresh / Current / Classics

And to have 3 C's, that could be Crisp new / Current / Classics

Classical thinking can be opposed to "fresh" thinking, it has more positive connotations that dusty old. Current thinking/opinion can be used to describe the current mainstream (it is in fact the name of a series of scientific journals publishing reviews, e.g. Current opinion on cell biology)

EDIT: I see now that I read your post too quickly and that you forgot a comma between "fresh" and thinking! You should indicate what type of content you are classifying.

Still, you could have categories as : Fresh / Current / Classics

And to have 3 C's, that could be Crisp new / Current / Classics

Depending on the type of content you want to classify, classical can be opposed to "fresh" thinking, it has more positive connotations that dusty old. Current can be used to describe the current mainstream, so it is not deprecated but isn't novel either.

So you could have categories as : Fresh / Current / Classics

And to have 3 C's, that could be Crisp new / Current / Classics

2 added 72 characters in body
source | link

Classical thinking can be opposed to "fresh" thinking, it has more positive connotations that dusty old. Current thinking/opinion can be used to describe the current mainstream (it is in fact the name of a series of scientific journals publishing reviews, e.g. Current opinion on cell biology)

EDIT: I see now that I read your post too quickly and that you forgot a comma between "fresh" and thinking! You should indicate what type of content you are classifying.

Still, you could have categories as : Fresh / Current / Classics

And to have 3 C's, that could be Crisp new / Current / Classics

Classical thinking can be opposed to "fresh" thinking, it has more positive connotations that dusty old. Current thinking/opinion can be used to describe the current mainstream (it is in fact the name of a series of scientific journals publishing reviews, e.g. Current opinion on cell biology)

EDIT: I see now that I read your post too quickly and that you forgot a comma between "fresh" and thinking! You should indicate what type of content you are classifying.

Classical thinking can be opposed to "fresh" thinking, it has more positive connotations that dusty old. Current thinking/opinion can be used to describe the current mainstream (it is in fact the name of a series of scientific journals publishing reviews, e.g. Current opinion on cell biology)

EDIT: I see now that I read your post too quickly and that you forgot a comma between "fresh" and thinking! You should indicate what type of content you are classifying.

Still, you could have categories as : Fresh / Current / Classics

And to have 3 C's, that could be Crisp new / Current / Classics

1
source | link

Classical thinking can be opposed to "fresh" thinking, it has more positive connotations that dusty old. Current thinking/opinion can be used to describe the current mainstream (it is in fact the name of a series of scientific journals publishing reviews, e.g. Current opinion on cell biology)

EDIT: I see now that I read your post too quickly and that you forgot a comma between "fresh" and thinking! You should indicate what type of content you are classifying.