Timeline for Is there a word for a person with only one head?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2023 at 9:10 | comment | added | Stuart F | You could use monocephalus facetiously for a beast with one head (just as you sometimes hear biclops for a beast with two eyes in contrast to cyclops), but monocephalous seems more fitting in general. | |
| Jun 15, 2020 at 7:40 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Dec 31, 2016 at 13:22 | history | edited | BladorthinTheGrey | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Correct inadvertent code blocks
|
| Dec 3, 2012 at 4:00 | comment | added | Paul Amerigo Pajo | @PSU "What is this teratology?" (use generously in place of "sorcery" or of course, "monstrosit") haha | |
| Sep 26, 2011 at 0:22 | history | edited | Daniel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body
|
| May 24, 2011 at 20:27 | comment | added | jcolebrand | what about unicephalot(us|ic)? | |
| May 24, 2011 at 14:58 | comment | added | PSU | I don't think monocephalus on syncephalus quite fit; both depend on double bodies, unlike monocephalous. The original question assumed double heads on a single body. But thanks for "teratology". Now I need to engineer a conversation into which it can be forced... | |
| May 24, 2011 at 9:07 | history | answered | Paul Amerigo Pajo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |