Timeline for What's the difference in usage between "annoyed at", "annoyed with", and "annoyed by"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2015 at 2:12 | history | protected | tchrist♦ | ||
| Dec 15, 2012 at 21:11 | answer | added | Steve Cobb | timeline score: 1 | |
| Oct 18, 2012 at 10:46 | history | edited | RegDwigнt |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 25, 2012 at 20:57 | answer | added | LaRos | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jul 16, 2011 at 19:04 | history | edited | Daniel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 8 characters in body
|
| May 22, 2011 at 10:49 | vote | accept | R.K. | ||
| May 19, 2011 at 22:30 | history | edited | Uticensis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| May 19, 2011 at 18:35 | comment | added | JeffSahol | It seems to me that "by" is more commonly used for something that normally/always annoys, as opposed to something that is currently annoying: "I am annoyed by your loud music" means "when you play your music too loudly, I get annoyed", as opposed "I am annoyed at your loud music". It is not a hard and fast rule at all...substitute "get" for "am" in the above examples, for example. | |
| May 19, 2011 at 17:04 | history | edited | RegDwigнt |
edited tags
|
|
| May 19, 2011 at 16:23 | answer | added | SLaks | timeline score: 15 | |
| May 19, 2011 at 16:23 | answer | added | z7sg Ѫ | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 19, 2011 at 16:12 | history | asked | R.K. | CC BY-SA 3.0 |