Timeline for How do you quote a passage that has used '[sic]' mistakenly?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
34 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2019 at 14:40 | review | Close votes | |||
| May 11, 2019 at 23:02 | |||||
| Mar 1, 2018 at 12:47 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 2, 2018 at 20:26 | |||||
| Feb 11, 2018 at 18:52 | answer | added | boisvert | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 15, 2017 at 7:19 | answer | added | Jelila | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 25, 2017 at 19:39 | comment | added | Fabian Röling | How does one quote this question? (Related: "Is it possible to use RegEx to parse this answer?" stackoverflow.com/a/1732454/6743127) | |
| Oct 9, 2015 at 7:08 | comment | added | Dewi Morgan | The problem with anything other than the first option is that if you then quote those, into a third level of siccing or beyond, then you will be required by poetic imperative to quote it as "...suppose I write a letter from me [sic ad nauseam] to you." | |
| S Oct 11, 2012 at 13:51 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| S Oct 11, 2012 at 13:51 | history | unlocked | CommunityBot | ||
| S Oct 11, 2012 at 12:47 | history | notice added | RegDwigнt | Content dispute | |
| S Oct 11, 2012 at 12:47 | history | locked | RegDwigнt | ||
| Jul 29, 2012 at 18:16 | answer | added | ashes | timeline score: 8 | |
| Nov 10, 2011 at 13:08 | history | edited | avpaderno |
edited tags
|
|
| May 13, 2011 at 18:57 | vote | accept | Mitch | ||
| May 13, 2011 at 12:27 | answer | added | Shathur | timeline score: 11 | |
| May 13, 2011 at 8:55 | answer | added | veredesmarald | timeline score: 17 | |
| May 12, 2011 at 22:49 | answer | added | Sklivvz | timeline score: 16 | |
| May 12, 2011 at 10:25 | history | protected | RegDwigнt | ||
| May 12, 2011 at 1:12 | answer | added | SLaks | timeline score: 28 | |
| May 11, 2011 at 23:42 | answer | added | Ariel | timeline score: 33 | |
| May 11, 2011 at 21:16 | answer | added | pfarrell | timeline score: 13 | |
| May 11, 2011 at 20:34 | answer | added | gcb | timeline score: 30 | |
| May 11, 2011 at 19:54 | answer | added | Michael Easter | timeline score: 26 | |
| May 11, 2011 at 19:16 | answer | added | Ralph Dratman | timeline score: 21 | |
| May 11, 2011 at 19:09 | answer | added | Tim | timeline score: 16 | |
| May 11, 2011 at 18:29 | answer | added | Chris Cudmore | timeline score: 55 | |
| May 11, 2011 at 18:05 | answer | added | Fraser Orr | timeline score: 24 | |
| May 11, 2011 at 15:27 | answer | added | Rex Kerr | timeline score: 78 | |
| May 11, 2011 at 14:16 | comment | added | Mitch | @e.James: the obvious motivation...why can't copy editors be more like engineers, quoting and escaping more logically? Quoting should be assumed verbatim always and therefore '[sic]' unnecessary (but of course there are problems with this...what if there is a transcription error?). For example when quoting, you should include the punctuation of the original -inside- the quote, and additionally punctuate your sentence that is employing the quote, no double usage. | |
| May 11, 2011 at 11:20 | answer | added | Unreason | timeline score: 14 | |
| May 11, 2011 at 9:33 | answer | added | Oswald | timeline score: 192 | |
| May 11, 2011 at 6:17 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackEnglish/status/68198139013771264 | ||
| May 11, 2011 at 4:03 | answer | added | James Eichele | timeline score: 355 | |
| May 11, 2011 at 3:33 | answer | added | Serodis | timeline score: 29 | |
| May 11, 2011 at 3:00 | history | asked | Mitch | CC BY-SA 3.0 |