Skip to main content
replaced http://english.stackexchange.com/ with https://english.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

According to a 1901 article quoted in this answeranswer to the question, Etymology of “dude” and progression in languageEtymology of “dude” and progression in language, the original feminine version of dude was dud. (Just adding this as a historical curiosity, not a present-day suggestion.)

According to a 1901 article quoted in this answer to the question, Etymology of “dude” and progression in language, the original feminine version of dude was dud. (Just adding this as a historical curiosity, not a present-day suggestion.)

According to a 1901 article quoted in this answer to the question, Etymology of “dude” and progression in language, the original feminine version of dude was dud. (Just adding this as a historical curiosity, not a present-day suggestion.)

added parenthetical
Source Link
Callithumpian
  • 24.9k
  • 8
  • 75
  • 167

According to a 1901 article quoted in this answer to the question, Etymology of “dude” and progression in language, the original feminine version of dude was dud. (Just adding this as a historical curiosity, not a present-day suggestion.)

According to a 1901 article quoted in this answer to the question, Etymology of “dude” and progression in language, the original feminine version of dude was dud.

According to a 1901 article quoted in this answer to the question, Etymology of “dude” and progression in language, the original feminine version of dude was dud. (Just adding this as a historical curiosity, not a present-day suggestion.)

Source Link
Callithumpian
  • 24.9k
  • 8
  • 75
  • 167

According to a 1901 article quoted in this answer to the question, Etymology of “dude” and progression in language, the original feminine version of dude was dud.