Timeline for What's a less offensive substitute for "rep-whores"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2015 at 21:12 | comment | added | KyleMit♦ | Just to point out that I didn't say that it was 'bad' specifically. But I do feel as though the word, in this context, is inappropriate. Stack Exchange is a professional Q&A site. If it doesn't belong in a well moderated workplace, it doesn't belong here. Also depending on who you ask, the word could be particularly offensive, and I'd rather err on the side of inclusivity. | |
| Feb 10, 2015 at 21:00 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 10, 2015 at 21:22 | |||||
| Feb 10, 2015 at 20:58 | history | answered | Fractal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |