Timeline for What is the contrastive phrase of "little to no"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:49 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://academia.stackexchange.com/ with https://academia.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:38 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://english.stackexchange.com/ with https://english.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Apr 18, 2015 at 17:35 | history | edited | ScotM | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
Feb 9, 2015 at 3:30 | vote | accept | Ooker | ||
Feb 8, 2015 at 17:09 | answer | added | bib | timeline score: 0 | |
Feb 8, 2015 at 16:14 | answer | added | sojourner | timeline score: 4 | |
Feb 8, 2015 at 13:19 | review | Close votes | |||
Feb 13, 2015 at 22:12 | |||||
Feb 8, 2015 at 12:57 | comment | added | Edwin Ashworth | 'Opposites' of 'negligible' could range from 'appreciable' ... 'considerable' through 'major' to 'overwhelming'. | |
Feb 8, 2015 at 12:28 | history | edited | Ooker | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 212 characters in body
|
Feb 8, 2015 at 12:09 | answer | added | Latty | timeline score: 0 | |
Feb 8, 2015 at 11:57 | comment | added | Latty | The main issue is that while there is a good, common term for 'no effect', there 'total effect' is far less common and sounds a little odd. It's a little hard to quantify the maximum amount of effort in comparison to how easy it is to quantify that there is none. The closest that sounds reasonable to me would be 'maximal (or as close as makes no difference) effort' (although, it's obviously verbose). | |
Feb 8, 2015 at 11:40 | answer | added | Oldbag | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 8, 2015 at 9:58 | comment | added | WS2 | The idiom with which I am familiar is little or no. | |
Feb 8, 2015 at 9:44 | comment | added | sqrtbottle | I've never come across such a phrase. In the same way that there's no (satisfactory) opposite to "negligible" as a word, I've never seen an idiom that would contrast this one. | |
Feb 8, 2015 at 9:26 | comment | added | blgt | Actually that's not exactly what the phrase means. It's closer to "effect so negligibly little it may as well be non-existent" | |
Feb 8, 2015 at 8:34 | comment | added | user66974 | Don't think there is a perfect opposite of it...I'd use 'large or total effect' | |
Feb 8, 2015 at 7:53 | history | asked | Ooker | CC BY-SA 3.0 |