Skip to main content
Question Protected by user2683
edited title
Link
FumbleFingers
  • 142.4k
  • 45
  • 297
  • 524

Why do we say "supposed"was supposed to" for "should have"?

deleted 1 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Uticensis
  • 22k
  • 72
  • 151
  • 240

Why do we say "supposed to" for "should have"?

"I was supposed to do my homework, but I went out clubbing instead."

I was supposed to do my homework, but I went out clubbing instead.

On a literal interpretation, supposed to suggests that other people (or indeed, myself) might have supposed (thought, imagined, assumed) that I would do my homework. I could continue the synonyms (expected, demanded, required,...) but they're getting further and further away from the 'core' meaning of supposed.

So far as I know, the verb to suppose only has the 'duty'-related sense when used as a past participle in this way. Is this true, and if so, why?

And how come my Mum can't suppose me to do my homework? If she supposed I was doing it, that doesn't imply she instructed me to do it - just that (in the absence of evidence to the contrary) she thought that's what I was doing.

(Added later) I think all the above would remain valid and still be exactly the same question if I'd asked about meant instead of supposed.

Why do we say "supposed to" for "should have"

"I was supposed to do my homework, but I went out clubbing instead."

On a literal interpretation, supposed to suggests that other people (or indeed, myself) might have supposed (thought, imagined, assumed) that I would do my homework. I could continue the synonyms (expected, demanded, required,...) but they're getting further and further away from the 'core' meaning of supposed.

So far as I know, the verb to suppose only has the 'duty'-related sense when used as a past participle in this way. Is this true, and if so, why?

And how come my Mum can't suppose me to do my homework? If she supposed I was doing it, that doesn't imply she instructed me to do it - just that (in the absence of evidence to the contrary) she thought that's what I was doing.

(Added later) I think all the above would remain valid and still be exactly the same question if I'd asked about meant instead of supposed.

Why do we say "supposed to" for "should have"?

I was supposed to do my homework, but I went out clubbing instead.

On a literal interpretation, supposed to suggests that other people (or indeed, myself) might have supposed (thought, imagined, assumed) that I would do my homework. I could continue the synonyms (expected, demanded, required,...) but they're getting further and further away from the 'core' meaning of supposed.

So far as I know, the verb to suppose only has the 'duty'-related sense when used as a past participle in this way. Is this true, and if so, why?

And how come my Mum can't suppose me to do my homework? If she supposed I was doing it, that doesn't imply she instructed me to do it - just that (in the absence of evidence to the contrary) she thought that's what I was doing.

(Added later) I think all the above would remain valid and still be exactly the same question if I'd asked about meant instead of supposed.

added tags
Link
added 151 characters in body
Source Link
FumbleFingers
  • 142.4k
  • 45
  • 297
  • 524
Loading
Source Link
FumbleFingers
  • 142.4k
  • 45
  • 297
  • 524
Loading