Skip to main content
added 182 characters in body
Source Link
David M
  • 22.6k
  • 12
  • 74
  • 124

When employing ordinal numbers you are explaining a relationship between items in a set. The term you use to describe those numbers will largely depend upon the items in the set.

For example: Primary care vs. Tertiary care. You would describe these levels as tiers. Hence, if there were quaternary care, etc. you would describe this as higher-tier.

If you are speaking of classes: First class, second class, etc. You would call these higher classed (and of course these would typically go in reverse order first being highest).

If you are speaking of orders: Tertiary, Quaternary, etc. You would call these higher-ordered.

And, in any case, if you wish to describe a portion of a set, you would typically define your terms: e.g. Higher-ordered thingamajigs (Quaternary and beyond).

Of course, given that order is within the base definition and etymology of ordinal, I would say high(er)-order is always superficially correct.

When employing ordinal numbers you are explaining a relationship between items in a set. The term you use to describe those numbers will largely depend upon the items in the set.

For example: Primary care vs. Tertiary care. You would describe these levels as tiers. Hence, if there were quaternary care, etc. you would describe this as higher-tier.

If you are speaking of classes: First class, second class, etc. You would call these higher classed (and of course these would typically go in reverse order first being highest).

If you are speaking of orders: Tertiary, Quaternary, etc. You would call these higher-ordered.

And, in any case, if you wish to describe a portion of a set, you would typically define your terms: e.g. Higher-ordered thingamajigs (Quaternary and beyond).

When employing ordinal numbers you are explaining a relationship between items in a set. The term you use to describe those numbers will largely depend upon the items in the set.

For example: Primary care vs. Tertiary care. You would describe these levels as tiers. Hence, if there were quaternary care, etc. you would describe this as higher-tier.

If you are speaking of classes: First class, second class, etc. You would call these higher classed (and of course these would typically go in reverse order first being highest).

If you are speaking of orders: Tertiary, Quaternary, etc. You would call these higher-ordered.

And, in any case, if you wish to describe a portion of a set, you would typically define your terms: e.g. Higher-ordered thingamajigs (Quaternary and beyond).

Of course, given that order is within the base definition and etymology of ordinal, I would say high(er)-order is always superficially correct.

Source Link
David M
  • 22.6k
  • 12
  • 74
  • 124

When employing ordinal numbers you are explaining a relationship between items in a set. The term you use to describe those numbers will largely depend upon the items in the set.

For example: Primary care vs. Tertiary care. You would describe these levels as tiers. Hence, if there were quaternary care, etc. you would describe this as higher-tier.

If you are speaking of classes: First class, second class, etc. You would call these higher classed (and of course these would typically go in reverse order first being highest).

If you are speaking of orders: Tertiary, Quaternary, etc. You would call these higher-ordered.

And, in any case, if you wish to describe a portion of a set, you would typically define your terms: e.g. Higher-ordered thingamajigs (Quaternary and beyond).