Skip to main content
15 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:38 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://english.stackexchange.com/ with https://english.stackexchange.com/
Jun 14, 2014 at 9:35 answer added nl-x timeline score: 0
Jun 14, 2014 at 9:20 history edited Mari-Lou A
edited tags
Feb 2, 2014 at 13:13 review Close votes
Feb 3, 2014 at 5:47
Feb 2, 2014 at 12:53 comment added FumbleFingers What @Kris said. If someone is "generically" uninformed (i.e. - they lack knowledge of many things that most other people know about), there's probably an unavoidable real-world negative connotation anyway. There would certainly need to be some reason (they know nothing because they're incurious, unobservant, unschooled, stupid, etc.). In the absence of any specific context, I therefore think this question is Unclear.
Feb 2, 2014 at 10:36 answer added Louel timeline score: 2
Feb 2, 2014 at 7:28 comment added Kris Just as ignorant does not mean or imply the same thing in every context, so will be your choice of an alternative. Consider one context at a time; include that in the question for now.
Feb 2, 2014 at 4:48 answer added David M timeline score: 1
Feb 2, 2014 at 4:32 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackEnglish/status/429834685716647937
Feb 2, 2014 at 2:26 answer added bib timeline score: 0
Feb 2, 2014 at 1:02 comment added user39720 I like Robusto's suggestion in the link you provided: unaware. TFD cites Collins English Dictionary's definition not fully cognizant of what is going on in the world. In my opinion, "He was unaware of X" has the same meaning as "He did not know X" without the stigma in "He was ignorant of X." Its synonym, incognizant, also seems a good choice.
Feb 2, 2014 at 0:45 comment added d'alar'cop "nescient", "in the dark" or "unlearned"?.. these are all quite neutral.
Feb 2, 2014 at 0:07 answer added Mari-Lou A timeline score: 0
Feb 1, 2014 at 23:53 review First posts
Feb 1, 2014 at 23:56
Feb 1, 2014 at 23:38 history asked redyoshi49q CC BY-SA 3.0