Timeline for Is there a phrase that means sleeping with someone without sex?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7 at 17:17 | history | wiki removed | tchrist♦ | ||
| Feb 4, 2014 at 3:08 | comment | added | David Schwartz | If you can swing it, "nap" probably is a good way to go. The problem is that "taking a nap" is very different than spending the night with someone. Because you usually take a a nap alone, during the day, it pretty much excludes the "sleeping in the same bed with someone overnight" situation. But there could be cultural differences (I have to remind myself that the US is not the only English-speaking country :) ) | |
| Jan 31, 2014 at 10:01 | comment | added | user13107 |
@rolfl it does not even suggest that X was taking a nap at the same time that's the point!
|
|
| Jan 31, 2014 at 1:19 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Crayon | ||
| Jan 30, 2014 at 5:22 | comment | added | Newb | Unfortunately, nap is not entirely free of sexual connotations. Sexual actions can be implied, or can follow from lying down for a nap together. A nap does not imply the absence of sexual actions. | |
| Jan 29, 2014 at 12:59 | comment | added | rolfl | and also something you do in the afternoon, not at night, and especially not for the whole night. Further, it does not even suggest that X was taking a nap at the same time ;-)... and double-problem, everyone knows not to nap with X'es. | |
| Jan 29, 2014 at 8:16 | comment | added | Gangnus | But also it is for short periods only. | |
| Jan 29, 2014 at 7:52 | history | edited | Em1 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Jan 29, 2014 at 6:49 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Jan 29, 2014 at 7:52 | |||||
| Jan 29, 2014 at 6:33 | history | answered | user13107 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |