Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 8, 2014 at 15:18 comment added mplungjan If I am authenticated as Michel to a system and I would like to log on as another user, I need to de-authenticate my session so it will treat me as another user.
Jan 8, 2014 at 14:52 comment added J.R. @mplungjan - Whether it's an opposite or an antonym, I think it was unclear either way. I'm glad the O.P. took some time to clarify.
Jan 8, 2014 at 13:54 comment added oerkelens I am not sure I can imagine how that works... revoking authorization, yes. But authentication is an identification. In order to make sure you remove authentication from a previously authenticated entity, you would have to make sure that you are dealing with the correct entity - meaning you need to authenticate. If authentication fails on that instance, you cannot remove earlier authentication. If authentication succeeds, however, you have just established that the earlier authentication should be regarded as valid.
Jan 8, 2014 at 12:26 comment added mplungjan @J.R. the word "antonym" was my (erroneous) correction/interpretation. He needs the OPPOSITE of authentication, i.e. the word for removal of a previously given authentication
Jan 8, 2014 at 11:19 comment added J.R. Andrew's observation is dead-on, but I see that as more of a problem with the O.P.'s question than with your answer. The O.P. hasn't even described what kind of "antonym" he is looking for. The antonym for "light" can be "dark" – or it can be "heavy", depending on what you are trying to say.
Jan 8, 2014 at 10:43 comment added MartinSGill Agree; a good clarification.
Jan 8, 2014 at 10:38 comment added Andrew Leach Unauthenticated would usually mean "not yet authenticated", rather than "no longer authenticated". But the question is not clear as to which is required.
Jan 8, 2014 at 10:32 history answered MartinSGill CC BY-SA 3.0