Timeline for A positive way to describe a know it all
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 25, 2016 at 13:36 | comment | added | aparente001 | @Zibbobz - Water under the bridge! | |
| Oct 25, 2016 at 13:17 | comment | added | Zibbobz | @aparente001 Having a second look at the word and its definition, I think I'd have to agree with you - sadly, this downvote is over 3 years old, so I can't retract it. | |
| Oct 25, 2016 at 12:59 | comment | added | aparente001 | @Zibbobz - I mean, in the context, crackerjack works for intellectual and factual pursuits. However, the one aspect where I somewhat agree with your original comment, is the correcting part. Yes, one would have to do a little bit more with this, to convey that part. But I think crackerjack has promise and I disagree with your downvote. | |
| Oct 25, 2016 at 12:53 | comment | added | Zibbobz | @aparente001 It is an excellent word, I will give you that. | |
| Oct 25, 2016 at 7:17 | comment | added | aparente001 | @Zibbobz - I disagree. Crackerjack is a creative contribution to this question. | |
| Sep 11, 2013 at 18:05 | comment | added | Zibbobz | Downvoting, because it does not specifically apply to intellectual or factual pursuits, nor in correcting others who are wrong. | |
| Sep 11, 2013 at 18:00 | history | edited | user49727 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 68 characters in body
|
| Sep 11, 2013 at 17:55 | history | answered | user49727 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |