Podcast #128: We chat with Kent C Dodds about why he loves React and discuss what life was like in the dark days before Git. Listen now.
3 replaced http://english.stackexchange.com/ with https://english.stackexchange.com/
source | link

These are complements of sense verbssense verbs (the first case discussed in this answerin this answer) and have a number of peculiarities. Of particular interest is the fact that the non-volitional sense verbs can take all four varieties of complement. Which includes gerund and infinitive complements, like these.

The difference between infinitive and gerund complements, "roughly speaking", according to McCawley"roughly speaking", according to McCawley, is that gerunds correspond to events, while infinitives correspond to situation types. There is minimal or no difference between the meanings of

  • He saw me talking to her.
  • He saw me talk to her.

because of facts about vision and conversation, and the usages of complements.

  • He saw me talking to her means he witnessed my conversational activity with her.
  • He saw me talk to her means he knows that I talked to her because he witnessed the event.

In other words, if he saw one, he saw the other. This is not necessarily true for all predicates;
i.e, He saw me running the marathon does not necessarily mean He saw me run the marathon.

These are complements of sense verbs (the first case discussed in this answer) and have a number of peculiarities. Of particular interest is the fact that the non-volitional sense verbs can take all four varieties of complement. Which includes gerund and infinitive complements, like these.

The difference between infinitive and gerund complements, "roughly speaking", according to McCawley, is that gerunds correspond to events, while infinitives correspond to situation types. There is minimal or no difference between the meanings of

  • He saw me talking to her.
  • He saw me talk to her.

because of facts about vision and conversation, and the usages of complements.

  • He saw me talking to her means he witnessed my conversational activity with her.
  • He saw me talk to her means he knows that I talked to her because he witnessed the event.

In other words, if he saw one, he saw the other. This is not necessarily true for all predicates;
i.e, He saw me running the marathon does not necessarily mean He saw me run the marathon.

These are complements of sense verbs (the first case discussed in this answer) and have a number of peculiarities. Of particular interest is the fact that the non-volitional sense verbs can take all four varieties of complement. Which includes gerund and infinitive complements, like these.

The difference between infinitive and gerund complements, "roughly speaking", according to McCawley, is that gerunds correspond to events, while infinitives correspond to situation types. There is minimal or no difference between the meanings of

  • He saw me talking to her.
  • He saw me talk to her.

because of facts about vision and conversation, and the usages of complements.

  • He saw me talking to her means he witnessed my conversational activity with her.
  • He saw me talk to her means he knows that I talked to her because he witnessed the event.

In other words, if he saw one, he saw the other. This is not necessarily true for all predicates;
i.e, He saw me running the marathon does not necessarily mean He saw me run the marathon.

2 added 259 characters in body
source | link

These are complements of sense verbs (the first case discussed in this answer) and have a number of peculiarities. Of particular interest is the fact that the non-volitional sense verbs can take all four varieties of complement. Which includes gerund and infinitive complements, like these.

ThereThe difference between infinitive and gerund complements, "roughly speaking", according to McCawley, is that gerunds correspond to events, while infinitives correspond to situation types. There is minimal or no difference between the meanings of

  • He saw me talking to her.
  • He saw me talk to her.

because of facts about vision and conversation, and the usages of complements.

  • He saw me talking to her means he witnessed my conversational activity with her.
  • He saw me talk to her means he knows that I talked to her because he witnessed the event.

In other words, if he saw one, he saw the other. This is not necessarily true for all predicates;
i.e, He saw me running the marathon does not necessarily mean He saw me run the marathon.

These are complements of sense verbs (the first case discussed in this answer) and have a number of peculiarities. Of particular interest is the fact that the non-volitional sense verbs can take all four varieties of complement.

There is minimal or no difference between the meanings of

  • He saw me talking to her.
  • He saw me talk to her.

because of facts about vision and conversation, and the usages of complements.

  • He saw me talking to her means he witnessed my conversational activity with her.
  • He saw me talk to her means he knows that I talked to her because he witnessed the event.

In other words, if he saw one, he saw the other. This is not necessarily true for all predicates;
i.e, He saw me running the marathon does not necessarily mean He saw me run the marathon

These are complements of sense verbs (the first case discussed in this answer) and have a number of peculiarities. Of particular interest is the fact that the non-volitional sense verbs can take all four varieties of complement. Which includes gerund and infinitive complements, like these.

The difference between infinitive and gerund complements, "roughly speaking", according to McCawley, is that gerunds correspond to events, while infinitives correspond to situation types. There is minimal or no difference between the meanings of

  • He saw me talking to her.
  • He saw me talk to her.

because of facts about vision and conversation, and the usages of complements.

  • He saw me talking to her means he witnessed my conversational activity with her.
  • He saw me talk to her means he knows that I talked to her because he witnessed the event.

In other words, if he saw one, he saw the other. This is not necessarily true for all predicates;
i.e, He saw me running the marathon does not necessarily mean He saw me run the marathon.

1
source | link

These are complements of sense verbs (the first case discussed in this answer) and have a number of peculiarities. Of particular interest is the fact that the non-volitional sense verbs can take all four varieties of complement.

There is minimal or no difference between the meanings of

  • He saw me talking to her.
  • He saw me talk to her.

because of facts about vision and conversation, and the usages of complements.

  • He saw me talking to her means he witnessed my conversational activity with her.
  • He saw me talk to her means he knows that I talked to her because he witnessed the event.

In other words, if he saw one, he saw the other. This is not necessarily true for all predicates;
i.e, He saw me running the marathon does not necessarily mean He saw me run the marathon