3 deleted 27 characters in body
source | link

"That" is a demonstrative pronoun in this case (it cannot be a relative pronoun because it is not followed by a verb in its clause). It stands in apposition to "pattern" and should have been preceded by a comma. The entire sentence is confusing because it is poorly written. The phrase "that of overpopulation" is a dangling modifier.

For what it's worth, the sentence is poorly written because it includes duplicate information ("as population grew"..."that of overpopulation"), unnecessary information ("unfortunately"), unnecessary nominalizations (overpopulation, over-exploitation), and poor sentence structure (it doesn't flow logically). Oh yeah, and it's passive.

Why not just say, "The population did not just grow; it exploded. This rapid growth established a pattern of overpopulation that led to resources being over-exploited."

"That" is a demonstrative pronoun in this case (it cannot be a relative pronoun because it is not followed by a verb in its clause). It stands in apposition to "pattern" and should have been preceded by a comma. The entire sentence is confusing because it is poorly written. The phrase "that of overpopulation" is a dangling modifier.

For what it's worth, the sentence is poorly written because it includes duplicate information ("as population grew"..."that of overpopulation"), unnecessary information ("unfortunately"), unnecessary nominalizations (overpopulation, over-exploitation), and poor sentence structure (it doesn't flow logically). Oh yeah, and it's passive.

Why not just say, "The population did not just grow; it exploded. This rapid growth established a pattern of overpopulation that led to resources being over-exploited."

"That" is a demonstrative pronoun in this case (it cannot be a relative pronoun because it is not followed by a verb in its clause). It stands in apposition to "pattern" and should have been preceded by a comma. The entire sentence is confusing because it is poorly written. The phrase "that of overpopulation" is a dangling modifier.

For what it's worth, the sentence is poorly written because it includes duplicate information ("as population grew"..."that of overpopulation"), unnecessary information ("unfortunately"), unnecessary nominalizations (overpopulation, over-exploitation), and poor sentence structure (it doesn't flow logically).

Why not just say, "The population did not just grow; it exploded. This rapid growth established a pattern of overpopulation that led to resources being over-exploited."

2 two instances of erroneous "its" corrected to "it's"; corrected spelling of "lead" to "led"; improved punctuation
source | link

"That" is a demonstrative pronoun in this case (it cannot be a relative pronoun because it is not followed by a verb in its clause). It stands in apposition to "pattern" and should have been preceded by a comma. The entire sentence is confusing because it is poorly written. The phrase "that of overpopulation" is a dangling modifier.

For what itsit's worth, the sentence is poorly written because it includes duplicate information ("as population grew"..."that of overpopulation"), unnecessary information ("unfortunately"), unnecessary nominalizations (overpopulation, over-exploitation), and poor sentence structure (it doesn't flow logically). Oh yeah, and itsit's passive.

Why not just say: The, "The population did not just grow; it exploded. This rapid growth established a pattern of overpopulation that leadled to resources being over-exploited."

"That" is a demonstrative pronoun in this case (it cannot be a relative pronoun because it is not followed by a verb in its clause). It stands in apposition to "pattern" and should have been preceded by a comma. The entire sentence is confusing because it is poorly written. The phrase "that of overpopulation" is a dangling modifier.

For what its worth, the sentence is poorly written because it includes duplicate information ("as population grew"..."that of overpopulation"), unnecessary information ("unfortunately"), unnecessary nominalizations (overpopulation, over-exploitation), and poor sentence structure (it doesn't flow logically). Oh yeah, and its passive.

Why not just say: The population did not just grow; it exploded. This rapid growth established a pattern of overpopulation that lead to resources being over-exploited.

"That" is a demonstrative pronoun in this case (it cannot be a relative pronoun because it is not followed by a verb in its clause). It stands in apposition to "pattern" and should have been preceded by a comma. The entire sentence is confusing because it is poorly written. The phrase "that of overpopulation" is a dangling modifier.

For what it's worth, the sentence is poorly written because it includes duplicate information ("as population grew"..."that of overpopulation"), unnecessary information ("unfortunately"), unnecessary nominalizations (overpopulation, over-exploitation), and poor sentence structure (it doesn't flow logically). Oh yeah, and it's passive.

Why not just say, "The population did not just grow; it exploded. This rapid growth established a pattern of overpopulation that led to resources being over-exploited."

1
source | link

"That" is a demonstrative pronoun in this case (it cannot be a relative pronoun because it is not followed by a verb in its clause). It stands in apposition to "pattern" and should have been preceded by a comma. The entire sentence is confusing because it is poorly written. The phrase "that of overpopulation" is a dangling modifier.

For what its worth, the sentence is poorly written because it includes duplicate information ("as population grew"..."that of overpopulation"), unnecessary information ("unfortunately"), unnecessary nominalizations (overpopulation, over-exploitation), and poor sentence structure (it doesn't flow logically). Oh yeah, and its passive.

Why not just say: The population did not just grow; it exploded. This rapid growth established a pattern of overpopulation that lead to resources being over-exploited.