-1

Can style adressing be used in the first person, as in "I, My Majesty, King Charles, by the Grace of God..." instead of:

I, Charles the Third, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of My other Realms and Territories, King, Defender of the Faith

(Source)

P.S. I don't wanna debate wether it sounds arrogant or not, all I wanna know is if it's grammatically correct.

Improve this question
11
  • 4
    I don't think grammar is what makes this abominable etiquette.
    – Peter Shor
    Commented Nov 4, 2022 at 20:53
  • 1
    That would sound more hilarious than arrogant. But it wouldn't be ungrammatical.
    – user405662
    Commented Nov 4, 2022 at 20:53
  • 4
    Being "grammatically correct" doesn't mean that it's semantically correct.
    – Hot Licks
    Commented Nov 4, 2022 at 20:54
  • 1
    This makes an interesting philosophical situation, does semantic incongruity entail grammatical incorrectness. Can one refer to oneself as 'my majesty'? People refer to themselves in the third person and that is notoriously strange but it still follows phrase structure grammar. But "I, My Majesty..." is hard to process semantically... can one be one's own 'majesty'? Which is to say it may be grammatical or it may not...one would need to analyze the grammar of things like 'your highness' and such to see if this fits the pattern.
    – Mitch
    Commented Nov 4, 2022 at 21:08
  • 5
    Majestic people don't tell you they're majestic, and humble people don't tell you they're humble. Although we won't deny either.
    – Yosef Baskin
    Commented Nov 4, 2022 at 21:19

2 Answers 2

Reset to default
4

No, forms of address such as Your Majesty, Your Royal Highness or My Lord are never used in the first person - not because of grammar, just because it isn't traditional usage.

Improve this answer
1
  • How about my awesomeness :)
    – banuyayi
    Commented Nov 5, 2022 at 9:14
-1

I searched google ngram with two terms "my awesomeness" and "my majesty", apparently my majesty was used, mostly in ancient texts and translations but also relatively recent texts.

enter image description here

Book search results 1 and 2

Improve this answer
3
  • 5
    Most of the uses of 'My Majesty' as a title seem, as you say, to come from ancient Middle Eastern texts, which are obviously translations. The Shakespeare one - 'laid by my majesty' is not a form of address, and the Francis Bacon is a false positive from a page printed in two columns being scanned right across.
    – Kate Bunting
    Commented Nov 5, 2022 at 9:40
  • 1
    But some of these hits are good.
    – GEdgar
    Commented Nov 5, 2022 at 11:03
  • 4
    Absent something to distinguish a capitalised Majesty - an honorific, from lowercase majesty - an attribute, the Ngram is pointless and misleading. Additionally, the Ngram does not disregard such phrases as "My Majesty speaks wisely."
    – Greybeard
    Commented Nov 5, 2022 at 12:45

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .