network profile
| bio | website | twitter.com/leonfromearth |
|---|---|---|
| location | Stavanger, Norway | |
| age | 29 | |
| visits | member for | 2 years, 1 month |
| seen | Nov 28 '12 at 17:48 | |
| stats | profile views | 14 |
Earth creature.
|
Jul 7 |
awarded | Autobiographer |
|
Dec 12 |
awarded | Commentator |
|
Dec 12 |
comment |
Image in article Precisely- But then I wanted this for an average person. |
|
Dec 12 |
comment |
Image in article I was thinking of using it where a prescribed layout is required for an editor of an article. There needs to be an image/graphic/etc in one paragraph on a particular column. I think to describe this, the wording 'an illustration' covers it. |
|
Dec 12 |
accepted | Image in article |
|
Dec 12 |
comment |
Image in article That'll do! Thanks. |
|
Dec 12 |
asked | Image in article |
|
May 7 |
accepted | Look and 'feel' of a web page/site/app |
|
May 6 |
comment |
Look and 'feel' of a web page/site/app I think this is indeed more accurate. The experience could encompass the feel, looks and any other observation on the matter. So simple and nice. |
|
May 6 |
comment |
Look and 'feel' of a web page/site/app @Joachim - This is what I'm questioning- isn't there a word we can use for 'Not necessarily referring to tactition, more to an emotional feeling...' when describing the perception of a webpage? To settle on just 'feel' as I said, seems a little lazy wrt software/GUIs. |
|
May 6 |
comment |
Look and 'feel' of a web page/site/app I understand the Wikipedia excerpt. The thing is, say you meet someone at some social arrangement. The first sense we use is sight- we look at them (although some tend to use other means). By 'observing' them we create the notion of their character- "gosh he's interesting/annoying in the way he does xyz". Even by feeling their touch we can also add to this 'character' thing we are building- "mmm touchy". How they present themselves to just our sense of sight builds up a character profile. Back to something you see on-screen, you are in fact not feeling anything but perhaps characterising it? |
|
May 6 |
asked | Look and 'feel' of a web page/site/app |
|
Apr 20 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Apr 19 |
comment |
Pluralizing “personnel”? Good explanation too. :-) Thanks |
|
Apr 19 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Apr 19 |
accepted | Pluralizing “personnel”? |
|
Apr 19 |
comment |
Pluralizing “personnel”? Nice. The usage does imply personnel is correct. Persons in this case would be a generalisation of all the memberships in the store. |
|
Apr 19 |
comment |
Pluralizing “personnel”? Thanks. 'People' would be too general in the context- it could mean customers + employees + special guests combined- hence diluting the overall impression of the launch (only 100 people on launch? bleh). |
|
Apr 19 |
comment |
Pluralizing “personnel”? To me- when the store launches- there are extra helpers around- which means there is a difference between an employee and a helper. There are also special guests invited for the event (who can be seen to 'belong' to the store and separate from customers). Therefore, the word 'employees' implies- under the store's payroll but personnel can be a generalization of all persons 'belonging to the store'. |
|
Apr 19 |
comment |
Pluralizing “personnel”? @Alenanno. No. I meant launch. When a store is about to be launched- there will be more employees than normal. Launch not lunch :-) |
