network profile
| bio | website | |
|---|---|---|
| location | Melbourne, Australia | |
| age | 28 | |
| visits | member for | 2 years, 1 month |
| seen | May 13 at 1:15 | |
| stats | profile views | 15 |
Hi - how's it going?
My name's Chris, I'm a developer from Melbourne, Australia. I work for a large Australian retailer developing in-house software solutions.
I'm super passionate about all things coding, especially in the web development space.
My preferred languages include:
- PHP
- ActionScript 3
- The HTML/JS/CSS stack
- mySQL
|
Apr 11 |
accepted | Plural of “presence” |
|
Jan 14 |
accepted | Can an “s”-form plural follow an “s”-form possessive? |
|
Jan 10 |
comment |
Can an “s”-form plural follow an “s”-form possessive? @Kris: Not to try to justify asking a question in the first place, but the amount of conversation this is generating shows, in my opionion, that there is merit in asking this question. |
|
Jan 10 |
revised |
Can an “s”-form plural follow an “s”-form possessive? english |
|
Jan 10 |
comment |
Can an “s”-form plural follow an “s”-form possessive? @MattЭллен - This is my exact point. Maybe my example wasn't clear, but there is a distinct difference between electronic engineer, and electronics engineer. One is a robot, one is not. Although not as clear, there is a slight difference between a chemical shelf and a chemicals shelf |
|
Jan 10 |
comment |
Can an “s”-form plural follow an “s”-form possessive? @Kris: I'm not sure if my doubts are unfounded, when there seems to be a mix of answers, some indicating with the 's', some without. |
|
Jan 10 |
awarded | Editor |
|
Jan 10 |
revised |
Can an “s”-form plural follow an “s”-form possessive? english |
|
Jan 10 |
asked | Can an “s”-form plural follow an “s”-form possessive? |
|
Jul 14 |
asked | Plural of “presence” |
|
Jun 8 |
comment |
Defining profit loss in laymans terms - without using loss in the explanation Some really answers overall guys. But this is the most suitable to my needs |
|
Jun 8 |
accepted | Defining profit loss in laymans terms - without using loss in the explanation |
|
Jun 8 |
comment |
Defining profit loss in laymans terms - without using loss in the explanation So 'unmade profit' is an acceptable phrase? To be honest, I'm not convinced that fault carries the right implications - I like it, and appreciate the answer, but not sold on it. |
|
Jun 8 |
asked | Defining profit loss in laymans terms - without using loss in the explanation |
|
Apr 1 |
comment |
The word ‘dryly’ as an adverb @Kosmonaut Yes I realised my mistake with the title after CesarGon mentioned it. I believe Jimi Oke was good enough to edit it |
|
Mar 31 |
awarded | Scholar |
|
Mar 31 |
awarded | Supporter |
|
Mar 31 |
comment |
The word ‘dryly’ as an adverb @CesarGon good pickup. Thanks. |
|
Mar 31 |
accepted | The word ‘dryly’ as an adverb |
|
Mar 31 |
awarded | Student |
