Reputation
Top tag
Next privilege 250 Rep.
View close votes
Badges
4
Newest
 Critic
Impact
~8k people reached

Jan
26
comment semantic difference for the forms: “x of y” vs. “x of the y” vs. “y x”
"of" might also be a possessive connector. Is it less used than "'s" in this context? Conversely, do we use the "'s" for inanimate objects? And, is it correct? (like the "truck's wheel", vs. "the truck wheel", vs. "the wheel of the truck") ("the John's hand", vs. "the hand of John")
Jan
26
comment semantic difference for the forms: “x of y” vs. “x of the y” vs. “y x”
Ok, thank you for your comments, it helps a bit. So, your point is that semantically, there might be just no difference between compound noun and phrase version? At least, it depends on the context, or the object of the emphasising, right? Mhhh, now, what would be the more natural way? In everyday english, is it more common to make use of compound nouns, or phrases?
Jan
26
revised semantic difference for the forms: “x of y” vs. “x of the y” vs. “y x”
deleted 6 characters in body
Jan
26
asked semantic difference for the forms: “x of y” vs. “x of the y” vs. “y x”
Feb
28
awarded  Critic
Jun
21
comment Is there a name for how the Irish use so, so?
Actually, in French, depending on the region (of France or anywhere else), it's also quite common tu use the equivalents of 'so' donc, 'then' alors, or 'eh' hein in the same way, ie. at the end of the sentences, making them mid-finished but still mid-opened for a continuation ... I wouldn't say it's politeness marker, in any case, and I think the phenomenon is very specific to spoken, even colloquial language, so maybe NGrams won't help a lot here
Jun
12
comment Is it proper grammar to omit an ending quote at the end of a paragraph?
@J.R. Yes, true, it's definitely a blurry line. Note that I don't consider punctuation to be excluded from grammar :o) just in my sense, it's mostly ruled both by grammar and typo (most often by grammar, for sure, and probably that some would consider typo being within the grammar scope, but I don't). And this precise case is a good example on controversial case, probably.
Jun
12
comment Is it proper grammar to omit an ending quote at the end of a paragraph?
@J.R. indeed, punctuation is not grammar ... 'Punctuation' is a set of signs, just like 'alphabet' is. Thus, like alphabet is ruled by lexicon, syntax, morphology and typography, punctuation is ruled by lexicon (sometimes in some languages), syntax, morphology and typography. Here, the rule is a graphical arrangement, a visual sugar, and has strictly no incidence on the grammaticality. Then it's typography, and not grammar, definitely.
Jun
12
revised “He'd so much as touched” meaning
minor corrections
Jun
12
suggested approved edit on “He'd so much as touched” meaning
Jun
10
revised Difference between “robot”, “machine”, and “automaton”
added 54 characters in body
Jun
10
answered Difference between “robot”, “machine”, and “automaton”
Jun
8
suggested rejected edit on Is it proper grammar to omit an ending quote at the end of a paragraph?
Jun
8
comment Is it proper grammar to omit an ending quote at the end of a paragraph?
I think it is not 'proper grammar', since it is typography, not exactly grammar then :o)
Jun
7
comment “Nobody does something for nothing”
Indeed ... Corpora don't lie ... But in my sense those results represent the usage of the terms themselves in litterature during centuries, and in our case, that doesn't mean a lot ... Except maybe that if it's a twentieth century expression, it's more likely a "proverb", statistically ;-) Ow anyway, don't fight ... I think you're right, "proverb" is probably not the better choice for this expression.
Jun
7
revised considers a probability vector v containing the probabilities of jumping to each vertex
added 46 characters in body
Jun
6
revised considers a probability vector v containing the probabilities of jumping to each vertex
added 225 characters in body
Jun
6
awarded  Editor
Jun
6
revised considers a probability vector v containing the probabilities of jumping to each vertex
jump between vertices seems to be acceptable
Jun
6
answered considers a probability vector v containing the probabilities of jumping to each vertex