network profile
| bio | website | jooq.org |
|---|---|---|
| location | Zurich, Switzerland | |
| age | 31 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 5 months |
| seen | Nov 5 '12 at 16:32 | |
| stats | profile views | 18 |
I'm working as a software engineer for Adobe Basel, Switzerland.
Apart from that, I created the jOOQ and jOOX projects. jOOQ effectively combines complex SQL, typesafety, source code generation, active records, stored procedures, advanced data types, and Java in a fluent, intuitive DSL. jOOX is the jquery of Java: A simple wrapper for the org.w3c.dom package, to allow for fluent XML document creation and manipulation where DOM is required but too verbose
- http://www.jooq.org (the jOOQ homepage)
- http://code.google.com/p/joox/ (the jOOX homepage)
- http://blog.jooq.org/ (insights on Java, SQL and jOOQ)
|
Sep 13 |
comment |
Is “amend XX” a commonly understood English term to express “add something to XX” or “modify XX”? @Mitch: True. Formal would better describe it than exotic. Thanks! |
|
Sep 13 |
comment |
Is “amend XX” a commonly understood English term to express “add something to XX” or “modify XX”? @TRiG: You're probably right. By finding it "exotic" I meant finding it "exotic" in the context of generally modifying the object... |
|
Sep 13 |
comment |
Is “amend XX” a commonly understood English term to express “add something to XX” or “modify XX”? @Mitch: Adding, removing, even renaming the set... |
|
Sep 13 |
comment |
Is “amend XX” a commonly understood English term to express “add something to XX” or “modify XX”? Yes. amend really doesn't rectify things in the real-life context. It just modifies things... |
|
Sep 13 |
comment |
Is “amend XX” a commonly understood English term to express “add something to XX” or “modify XX”? That was my impression, too. It seemed to me that amend had a semantics indicating a change of quality that goes with the modification - as opposed to the simple modify |
