| bio | website | evancarroll.com |
|---|---|---|
| location | Houston, TX | |
| age | 27 | |
| visits | member for | 1 year, 6 months |
| seen | May 17 at 21:03 | |
| stats | profile views | 319 |
I AM AWESOME. Find me at my website
|
Aug 5 |
comment |
What do you call an item that appeals to a human urge but is unnatural? Name one thing that is supernatural and exists? |
|
Aug 5 |
comment |
What do you call an item that appeals to a human urge but is unnatural? It was relevant. It gave an example of something supernatural -- unlike Chocolate Cake, which is just supernormal. |
|
Aug 4 |
comment |
What do you call an item that appeals to a human urge but is unnatural? @tchrist you're on fire today. |
|
Aug 4 |
comment |
What do you call an item that appeals to a human urge but is unnatural? I'm tempted to accept this answer, even though it wasn't the one I was looking for! Well done Captain. Seldom in [single-word-choice] do you get a better answer then the one you were expecting. |
|
Aug 4 |
answered | What do you call an item that appeals to a human urge but is unnatural? |
|
Aug 4 |
asked | What do you call an item that appeals to a human urge but is unnatural? |
|
Aug 2 |
awarded | Talkative |
|
Jul 26 |
comment |
@Flexo it was stupidly dismissive, I didn't start my campaign for justice with ELU. I started it on day 1 on MSO. |
|
Jul 25 |
comment |
Why should I use “ought to”? That's an argument I'm willing to accept; however, I have a decent understanding of the term morning and astronomy, and so at least for most populated climates, there is no probability that the sun will not come up short of a solar catastrophe of an unforeseen magnitude. |
|
Jul 25 |
comment |
Why should I use “ought to”? @Carlo_R. if you use the term "ought to" you're making an implicit statement about the present condition. You'd never say the sun "ought to" come up at 8 AM: firstly, the sun can't react to instruction, secondly the sun already rises at 8 AM. Ought to implies the condition is mutable and it's not currently that way. Your replacements should and must don't carry that burden. |
|
Jul 25 |
awarded | Cleanup |
|
Jul 25 |
comment |
Why should I use “ought to”? Neither should nor must imply anything about the current condition. |
|
Jul 25 |
revised |
Why should I use “ought to”? rolled back to a previous revision |
|
Jul 25 |
revised |
Why should I use “ought to”? added 324 characters in body |
|
Jul 25 |
comment |
Why should I use “ought to”? It's additional information. What's wrong with that, where is that against the rules? |
|
Jul 25 |
revised |
Why should I use “ought to”? deleted 6 characters in body |
|
Jul 25 |
answered | Why should I use “ought to”? |
|
Jul 23 |
accepted | What does it mean to “Gild the Lily” |
|
Jul 23 |
comment |
@balpha That's rude, offensive, and unnecessarily dismissive; please remove that comment. Wanton personal attacks and libel should not be welcome on english.stackexchange.com. To others that observe this, this is precisely what we need to address as a community. Calling people a "troll" is unbecoming of useful discourse -- we can do better than that. I'm not a troll. I've never trolled, ever. |
|
Jul 23 |
comment |
@Tim What you are seeking, or what the community is seeking? This is another boldface presumption. Let the people decide what they perceive as a bigger problem. Let's take it to a vote. I'll help out with the mundane matters too; my agenda -- the people's agenda -- is where I'll stand out. |