Barrie England

78,831 reputation

487169

bio	website	caxton1485.wordpress.com
	location	United Kingdom
	age	70
visits	member for	1 year, 8 months
	seen	2 days ago
stats	profile views	5,901

I have spent most of my career in government service, much of it abroad. I have a degree in English Language and Literature from the University of Oxford and the Diploma in English Language Studies from the UK's Open University, and am qualified as a teacher of English to foreign learners. I have studied several other languages including French, German, Latin, Arabic and Old and Middle English.

My blog, Caxton, is mostly, but not entirely, about the English language.

Elsewhere on the web I have attempted to write in the constrained style of the 'Ouvroir de littérature potentielle' (OULIPO) in Variations on an Incident in Paris and in Variations on Jane Austen. I have also created a full set of 256 Syllogisms by figure and mood and showing which are valid and which are not.

	78,831 reputation	bio	website	caxton1485.wordpress.com	visits	member for	1 year, 8 months
487169 badges		location	United Kingdom		seen	2 days ago

summary answers questions tags badges favorites bounties reputation activity

5,490 Actions

suggestions reviews revisions comments badges posts accepts all

May 4	awarded	Necromancer
May 4	answered	“Functionalities;” According to Firefox, this word doesn't exist
Apr 27	awarded	Good Answer
Apr 23	comment	“Coquette” vs. “flirt” @tchrist. Thank you. I'll try to remember that.
Apr 17	answered	Can I bother someone “for” something?
Apr 15	comment	“He made a picture” vs. “he has made a picture” All I can tell you is that, at least in British English, the present perfect construcion is used to relate something that has happened, usually in the fairly recent past, that has some kind of bearing on the present situation.
Apr 15	comment	What part of speech is “methinks”? @John Lawler. But sometimes intransitive: 'I think, therefore I am.' And: 'What are you doing?' 'I'm thinking.'
Apr 14	answered	A grammar rule (Present perfect)
Apr 14	comment	Is “gonna have to” an Americanism? @Mitten. I can assure you that as a speaker of British English I'm quite capable of using it myself.
Apr 14	comment	“in every respect” vs “in every aspect” That should have been collocations.
Apr 14	comment	“in every respect” vs “in every aspect” The usual collacations are in every respect, but from every aspect.
Apr 14	comment	“He made a picture” vs. “he has made a picture” The context includes what follows, and it also includes the wider social framework.
Apr 14	comment	“in every respect” vs “in every aspect” Yes, you can in the appropriate context, but, in your example, respect is what is needed. I'll say in passing that the whole style is a little strange.
Apr 14	comment	“He made a picture” vs. “he has made a picture” It still depends on the context.
Apr 14	comment	“He made a picture” vs. “he has made a picture” It depends on what has gone on previously in the conversation.
Apr 14	answered	“in every respect” vs “in every aspect”
Apr 14	answered	“He made a picture” vs. “he has made a picture”
Apr 14	revised	Is “gonna have to” an Americanism? deleted 8 characters in body
Apr 14	answered	Is “gonna have to” an Americanism?
Apr 13	revised	Why do people say “that-a-way” instead of “that way”? added 40 characters in body