Hot answers tagged dialogue
“That seems like an odd way to use punctuation,” Tom said. “What harm would there be in using quotation marks at the end of every paragraph?” “Oh, that’s not all that complicated,” J.R. answered. “If you closed quotes at the end of every paragraph, then you would need to reidentify the speaker with every subsequent paragraph. “Say a narrative was ...
The verb hissed has several definitions. Chief among them are: to make a long “s” sound like the sound that a snake makes to say something in a low angry voice if people in an audience hiss, they make a long “s” sound to show that they do not like a speaker or performer All definitions from Macmillan, via OneLook.com. Now, the fact that the ...
One of the definitions of hiss, per Merriam-Webster online: to say (something) in a loud or angry whisper There is no mention of sibilants. Since whisper is certainly not limited to sibilants, either, it stands to reason that the act of hissing can include a phrase without sibilants.
That's what I'd call hijacking the conversation: VERB [WITH OBJECT] 1.2 Take over (something) and use it for a different purpose: the organization had been hijacked by extremists MORE EXAMPLE SENTENCES The public power belongs to everyone and when majorities hijack it for sectarian purposes they act oppressively. Where ...
The lack of closing quotation marks is a convenient clue for the reader that the quotation goes on beyond the end of the paragraph. The addition of quotation marks at the start of each paragraph within a multi-paragraph quotation ensures that a casual or forgetful reader is reminded that the paragraph he is reading is (part of) a quotation, which he might ...
The show you're talking about, Deadwood, was pretty famous for its language anachronisms, especially when it came to swearing. (A coincidence that one of its main characters is named Swearingen?) From "Talk Pretty" on Slate: In interviews, [David Milch, the creator and show runner of Deadwood,] has insisted that the show, particularly the flamboyantly ...
In the 1800s a hand job seems to have referred to a specific printing/bookbinding process done by hand. From Annual Report of the State Board of Arbitration of Illinois, Volumes 1-5: Q. What do you say as to competition in this particular line, hand job work, book and job work, what effect, if there is any, would such towns as Decatur, Jacksonville. ...
When you are quoting multiple paragraphs, closing quotations go only at the end of the entire quotation. Beginning quotes should be placed at the beginning of each paragraph, though; otherwise it would be hard to tell at a glance that the quotation was still ongoing. Common Errors by Brians (one of my new favorites) says it this way: When quoting a long ...
The rule is in place to allow for successive dialog. Two quoted paragraphs in succession with no end quotation mark in the first paragraph are a continued sentiment stated by one person that requires a paragraph break, whereas if there were an end quotation mark, the two paragraphs would be quotes said by different people. Its primary purpose is in ...
A corresponding conversation in English might go something like this: ― You should get yourself a girlfriend! ― A girlfriend? What’s that?! It’s more sarcasm than irony, and the reply is often “deadpanned”.
There is an idiom, stealing someone's thunder To use, appropriate, or preempt the use of another's idea, especially to one's own advantage and without consent by the originator. Similarly steal the spotlight to get attention for oneself. Ann always tries to steal the spotlight when she and I make a presentation [thefreedictionary.com] And steal ...
Thinking back, I believe coloured was originally a euphemism, used to avoid the word black which British people thought, probably correctly at the time, was offensive. I believe the demise of coloured as an acceptable term dates from the emergence of black, mainly from the American black community, as a term of pride. With the growth in the use of black, I ...
Another idiomatic option (at least in British English) would be: You should get yourself a girlfriend. Sorry, never heard of it. The use of the impersonal pronoun "it" is part of the humour; it indicates that the speaker not only has no girlfriend, but doesn't even understand the concept that a "girlfriend" might be a type of human being.
J.E. Lighter, The Random House Historical Dictionary of American Slang (1997) reports that "hand job" in its sexual sense goes back to 1937: hand job n 1. an act of masturbation, usu. by one person on another who is a male.—usu. considered vulgar. [First citation:] 1937 [Pietro] Di Donato Christ in Concrete 107: Then ... go into the cellar and do ...
Your capitalization of what you call a sentence violates the convention whereby a question mark indicates the end of a sentence. According to that same convention, your query text is actually three separate sentences. That's why MS Word's grammar checker is nagging you.
Short answer: Yes. “I care not” is idiomatic, but usually only as a standalone phrase. It has a slightly archaic feel to it, which makes it sound formal, which again makes it sound humorous. It is very common to use words or phrases from an inappropriate register to convey humour. It is not uncommon to hear something like this: They all say my new ...
The first is known as 'direct speech', the second as 'reported speech'.
It may have something to do with the rather archaic practice of: - “Using a “quotation mark at the “beginning of every line “of the quoted text. This “practise was actually “pretty commonplace during “the Georgian and Victo- “ian Eras.” See, for example, this 1759 edition of The Monthly Review on Google Books. (cf. Wikipedia article)
OP's second version is standard usage, which is why @Barrie calls it the "uninverted form". But note he's only referring to inversion of subject - verb (the object here being the quoted speech). The most common structure for English sentences is subject - verb - object... Joe said "The sky is blue". ...and the most common "sentence inversion" is ...
Neither. The right word here is "did": Haha. I'm glad you did! "I'm glad you have" would work if the first sentence were: "I have had ..."
Based on my recollection of the 80s and 90s in a white to multicultural bit of London I would say "not really". There were certainly white people who objected but they were progressive, even hippie-ish types in other ways.
The quote, if you take out the contraction is: I am not going to kill -spoiler-, Ben. You are. This is correct and idiomatic. It's echoing... am --- are If it had read: I will not kill -spoiler-, Ben. Then it would read: You will.
These make use of rhetorical devices, making sentences shorter and using repetition for emphasis. Of the rhetorical schemes detailed by Dr. L. Kip Wheeler, associate professor of Carson-Newman University, see the following: Anapodoton -- deliberately creating a sentence fragment by the omission of a clause: "If only you came with me!" If only students ...
Good question. I copyedit and proofread novels, so I can tell you that this is a grammatical error very commonly allowed in fiction. As you can imagine, novels allow for a bending of conventional grammar rules to account for author style and pacing. In the publishing process, editors develop a style sheet that lists exceptions to grammar and punctuation ...
Obviously, there is no punctuation in spoken dialogue. For a humorous take on what would happen if there were, listen to Victor Borge's routine on "phonetic punctuation." Instead we rely on tone, inflection, stress, and pauses to make our meaning clear. None of these aural cues are available for the written word, so for informational writing we have ...
He is talking about oppressed people generally, but he has dropped the pronoun. The expanded version being "You can't say no forever, right?" Captain America clearly prefers "you" to "one" as the gender-neutral indefinite pronoun. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_(pronoun)
"Hand job" appears to date only to the 1940s, so it would not likely have been in use in the 1800s. http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=hand+job
Speech is definitely different from formal writing, and trying to formalize the punctuation in dialogue seems (to me, personally) to take away the human element there. As a grammar enthusiast, I can appreciate your effort to try to choose the best punctuation for the sentence itself, but within dialogue, I think you have to be a little more forgiving in ...
Both may be used after what is said, but only the uninverted form is normally used before what is said.
As I understand things, you place a comma after the interruption if the first quotation was not a complete sentence, and a period if it was. The rule really is as simple as you inferred. The stylistic element comes in where you have to decide how you would punctuate a quotation if it wasn't to be broken. By example: "My most worthy adversary, we meet ...
Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible