Hot answers tagged

3

Short answer Only the matrix clause in a sentence requires subject-auxiliary inversion to make it interrogative (and not if the wh-word is part of a Subject phrase). In other words, all other things being equal, we use subject-auxiliary inversion to mark sentences, not subordinate clauses as interrogative. We only use the auxiliary DO, when some ...


1

In English, you used to be able to form questions by inverting the verb and the subject. So Shakespeare could say where go you with bats and clubs? We no longer do this: If the main verb has an auxiliary verb (is, do, can, will, etc.) we invert the subject and the auxiliary verb. But if there's no auxiliary verb, then unless the main verb is a form of ...


1

You might consider saying "Many famous churches line this street." or "This street is lined with many famous churches." line [verb] Stand or be positioned at intervals along: ‘a processional route lined by people waving flags’


1

The way "without" is normally used in such constructions, you can "invert" the sentence to understand the meaning better. "No a without b" is often equivalent to "if a, then b." So your example becomes: This is an SHA-1 checksum of the commit’s contents, which ensures that if a commit is ever corrupted, Git will know about it.



Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible