Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
33
votes
Accepted
What is a noun modifying clause?
The rule called Whiz-Deletion by linguists (from the fact that it deletes a Wh-word plus a form of be, quite often is; a monosyllabic variant of "Wh-is deletion"), when applied to a relative clause, creates … Interestingly, there is a codicil to Whiz-Deletion that applies when there is only one adjective left after deletion. …
15
votes
passive Vs active or omission of 'which is'
The rule is called Whiz-Deletion. The name is a mnemonic.
The Wh- part of Whiz-Deletion comes from the fact that relative pronouns start with wh-. … The -iz part of Whiz-Deletion comes from the fact that the most common form of be is is.
The "Deletion" part of Whiz-Deletion means that these are the parts that are deleted. …
13
votes
Accepted
Differences between Verb + to be + adjective and Verb + adjective
There is no specific rule saying when to perform this deletion; it's a matter of individual choice, like many other rules in English. … This rule (or app) is To-be-Deletion; a similar one for a different situation is Whiz-Deletion. …
12
votes
Accepted
"There are several reasons proposed for the collapse of the bridge."
This is another reduced relative clause, with Whiz-Deletion operating, this time on the be of the Passive, rather than the be of the Progressive, like the question this morning. … Whiz-deletion removes the boldfaced markers, since they are predictable (by native speakers, at least) and contribute nothing to the meaning, just the structure. …
12
votes
Accepted
What do you call a past participle+noun construction clause such as “No offense meant” “Your...
Given that, = Given that topic we just mentioned,
There is no general term for rules that do this, like To be-Deletion, Whiz Deletion, Conjunction Reduction, Conversational Deletion, etc. … They are deletion rules, obviously, but far from the only ones. …
8
votes
Accepted
Meaning and usage of “be of”
That-deletion results in
... the planes she flew ...
and Whiz-deletion results in
... the planes she flew were planes of dangerously experimental design. …
7
votes
Accepted
Passive auxiliary verb or progressive one?
be something like
another funny noise, [which was] like a mouse [which was] being trodden on
but both of the entirely predictable [which was] parts of these relative clauses have been deleted by Whiz-Deletion … The first (nonrestrictive) Whiz-deleted which was -- in the clause modifying noise -- contains just the normal auxiliary be required by the predicate adjective phrase like a mouse being trodden on. …
6
votes
Accepted
Am I using "that" too often?
Complementizer deletion is one of a number of shortenings that English uses, like contractions (don't, we'll), informal spellings of new contractions, (hafta, shouldna), Whiz-Deletion, Equi and Raising …
6
votes
Accepted
Adjective clause with 'so'
is shortened by ordinary Whiz-Deletion from
... physical activity, which is so vital for the developing body, is often overlooked ... …
6
votes
Accepted
"The paper on Monday published X" vs. "the paper published on Monday X"
The second sentence has a small Garden Path, since
The paper published on Monday
would normally be interpreted as a constituent, an NP modified by a relative clause reduced by Whiz-deletion from: …
6
votes
Skipping a relative pronoun
That is the effect of the syntactic rule mentioned above in comments, called Whiz-Deletion in the professional literature. …
5
votes
Does English allow a zero copula in subordinate clauses?
A very simple example is Whiz-Deletion, which applies to restrictive relative clauses, and deletes (as I will call it) the subject relative pronoun (the "Wh-" part) plus whatever inflected form of be it … Verbs that allow to be-Deletion include declare, consider, and feel.
He declared/considered/felt Max (to be) responsible for the accident. …
5
votes
The position of "strong enough" in "there is no headache strong enough"
The which is part gets zapped by the usual Whiz-deletion, leaving only the predicate adjective phrase and its complement. …
5
votes
Is "I already have two stamps drawn" grammatically correct?
This is reduced by Whiz-deletion to two stamps drawn, like
I already have seven chapters finished.
I already have three bags full. …
5
votes
Can a preposition have the form of superlative?
The repeated NP the chair is deleted in context, leaving only nearest to them, which could be perfectly ordinary in a relative clause
a voice spoke from the chair which was nearest to them
And then Whiz-deletion …