English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In Lucy Kellaway’s 2012 Golden flannel Award, the Preposition Award is given to a usage of to.

But the winner is the innocuous word “to” as increasingly heard in presentations: “I’ve got some slides to talk to” – the unfortunate implication being that the speaker has to talk to the slides because no one else is listening.

Am I right in thinking that the speaker originally intended to mean some images for projection on a screen? If so, what is the appropriate preposition in this sentence. “About” perhaps? Is this usage of to really often heard?

share|improve this question
The problem is the choice of phrasing and context. While I can speak to the use of to in this way, the sentence itself certainly sounds irregular and incorrect to me, in the sense that it fails to convey the correct meaning in a direct way. – Kris Jan 14 '13 at 11:55

While having slides to talk to may be unusual, one does often hear have something to speak to in this usage, yes. It's "bizspeak": Business English.

ODO has:

(speak to) answer (a question) or address (an issue or problem):
we should be disappointed if the report did not speak to the issue of literacy

In a meeting or presentation, one might hear the chairman introduce a topic as "And now we move on to the subject of cows in the car park which Mrs Sidebottom is going to speak to," that is, she is going to address that subject.

Business English seems to undergo change quite rapidly; it's possible to see how having slides to talk to is an evolution of having something to speak to, but as you and Bill Franke point out, it's rather absurd.

share|improve this answer

There’s nothing new about this use of to, and I can only suppose that Lucy Kellaway, like so many before her, was suffering from the Recency Ilusion. The OED’s definition 31b of to is ‘in support of; in assertion or acknowledgement of’, illustrated in this citation from 1884 ‘The hon. gentlemen spoke to a resolution congratulating the Government on the passing of the Franchise Bill’.

This clearly doesn’t mean the hon. Gentleman said ‘Good morning, how are you?’ to the resolution any more than talking to slides describes a conversation with them. Only the most perverse would think that.

share|improve this answer

Maybe I’m being daft but from context this sounds like the usage of “to” here is a mistake. In fact, the quote implies that it clearly is (the follow-up about “unfortunate implication” mocks this usage)1. What the speakers probably actually mean is “through”:

I’ve got some slides to talk through.

talk through” simply means to discuss. I’m assuming that the original quote refers to the fact that lots of people mispronounce this phrase since “talk to” sounds right.

1 But like Andrew and Barrie showed, Lucy Kellaway might simply be wrong. However, I don’t think that she is since “talk through some slides” is much more common, and thus more probably meant, than the meaning of “talk to” illustrated in those other answers.

share|improve this answer

Nobody else has suggested this, so I'll propose the following.
My interpretation of “I’ve got some slides to talk to” is that the subject has to make a presentation involving slides and talking but is not expecting the audience to listen. Therefore, in their opinion, the presentation is the same as literally just talking to the inanimate slides.

This may of course be an exaggeration or attempt at humour by the speaker.

share|improve this answer
+1 for having the courage to try humor here with only 109 points. Seriously, though, if I ever plan a presentation, I may try this joke during the preparation phase, as an attempt at self-deprecating humor. (Some of us can pull it off successfully. Others wouldn't dare. ;-) ) – Canis Lupus Jan 25 '13 at 21:58

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.