He enjoys skiing, playing the guitar, hiking, and wildlife.
Is this semantically correct? If not, is there something wrong with “enjoys … wildlife”?
Is this semantically correct? If not, is there something wrong with “enjoys … wildlife”? |
|||||||||
|
|
Nothing semantically wrong, but to keep parallelism you might add a verb in gerund form.
You might also move "playing the guitar" next to the wildlife, again to keep the forms similar.
|
|||
|
|
|
The term in rhetoric for your original construction is syllepsis.² Syllepsis is a parallelism in which the terms do not strictly agree in some way. The rhetorical use for it is to provide emphasis. My favorite humorous example is from the song “Have Some Madeira M’Dear”:
(Emphasis added.) Changing the sentence to use parallel grammar (that is, to use the same grammatical structure in each element)¹
is not a correction of an error. It is a stylistic choice. You might use syllepsis in one sentence to make a point, parallel grammar in another to make it easy to follow. |
|||||||||||||||||
|