Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The definition of fasteners as stated from Wikipedia is:

a hardware device that mechanically joins or affixes two or more objects together.

Is the definition of mechanical here sense 10 from Dictionary.com? I was confused because I figured the use of fasteners doesn't necessarily require machinery so if it's not the definitions related to machinery then it must mean the physical forces that you apply to the fastener when used to join things together?

enter image description here

share|improve this question
3  
The flaw in selecting one meaning from a list of 12 is the assumption that each item of the list is logically distinct. Item 10 is clearly broad enough to encompass 3, 5 and 9 (at least). The precise meaning will be found not by examining a set of potential synonyms but by considering possible antonyms relevant to this context. The "join" is not biological or chemical. –  Fortiter Jan 13 '13 at 0:36
    
@Fortiter is correct. –  Feral Oink Jan 13 '13 at 13:56
add comment

7 Answers

up vote 11 down vote accepted

A mechanical fastener relies on principles of mechanics to fasten materials together. This typically means that one side of the joint is prevented from moving relative to the other side of the joint by a physical abutment of the joint materials to other joint material or to the items being joined. This type of fastener includes nuts and bolts, screws, nails, velcro, etc. but excludes adhesives, glue, tape, electrostatics, magnetics, etc.

It is therefore sense 10:

pertaining to, controlled or effected by, physical forces.

share|improve this answer
1  
+1 However, it would better have been a definition that uses the term mechanics: "based on the principles of mechanics" -- a hardware device joins or affixes two or more objects together applying the principles of mechanics. –  Kris Jan 13 '13 at 13:09
add comment

Machinery in this sense need not be complex: a zip fastener is a simple machine, hence mechanical in sense 1. You can also fasten (some) things with a dab of superglue, which is in no sense a machine, and would not be called a fastener.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Agreed, "Sense 5" is the correct definition. "Mechanical" specifies the particular nature of the bond holding the 2 objects together -- in this case friction or abrasion as might be seen in a button, a nail, a zipper, or velcro. Alternative types of bonds might include "adhesive", "magnetic", "electro-static".

share|improve this answer
add comment

Senses 2 and 3, “being a machine” and “caused by or derived from machinery” are most appropriate, in that the Fasteners article refers mostly to simple machines in the forms of wedges, screws, and levers.

share|improve this answer
add comment

I don’t agree that definition 5 is the correct answer in the context of the question. It’s defining a mechanical fastening that joins two things together. In other words a fastener that is mechanically made.

From Oxford English Dictionary (OED):

mechanical, adj. and n.

Of the nature of a machine or machines; acting, worked, or produced by a machine or mechanism.

mechanically, adv.

Senses relating to machines or mechanisms.

A mechanical fastener is therefore a fastener made by machine. It therefore must be either definition 4 – using machine parts, or definition 3 – caused or derived from machinery.

share|improve this answer
add comment

There are mechanical fasteners, and there are fasteners. Wikipedia doesn't seem to distinguish between the two, based on the single quoted sentence in the question. Mechanical fasteners have been described at great length by other answers already (the question content provides an adequate definition of a mechanical fastener too).

The question specifically asks the following:

I figured the use of fasteners doesn't necessarily require machinery so if it's not the definitions related to machinery then it must mean the physical forces that you apply to the fastener when used to join things together?

No, that is not necessarily correct. There are fasteners such as buttons, for example. Let's put that aside, as a button doesn't actually use "fastener" in its name. A much better example is a hook-and-eye fastener. Hook-and-eye fasteners do not use adhesion, mechanical forces nor machinery to create a join. See below for an illustration.

Hook and eye fasteners on fabric

share|improve this answer
    
All mechanical fasteners work according to the principles of mechanics, including buttons, which may not exactly be fasterners, velcro, ... –  Kris Jan 13 '13 at 14:16
    
@Kris Yes, they work according to principles of classical mechanics, as opposed to quantum mechanics. I realize that. It wasn't clear to me that the question is distinguishing between mechanics based on physics versus mechanical as in a powered process, be it through electro-mechanical or deformation or whatever powers a zipper. Did I miss the point with this answer? I might have. Just tell me, I'll delete it. The image is huge, unfortunately. I don't know how to make it smaller, could only find images of fur coats and brassieres. –  Feral Oink Jan 13 '13 at 14:22
add comment

Sense 5, the fastening is by friction or "etc.".

share|improve this answer
1  
Actually Sense 5 is a specialized term used in describing shear (or sliding) forces between objects. The example of mechanical erosion in the definition is the clue. The mechanical "bonding" between stones also refers to preventive forces in shear between the two stones. –  Jim Jan 13 '13 at 0:24
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.