English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm investigating a Tom'n'Jerry sketch for cartoonists, containing basic graphics and tips how to draw the characters right. Unfortunately I don't have a digital version.

So the problem is with the phrase: "Think flow when connecting ear to head". I can't figure out what "flow" or "think flow" means in this context. The surrounding graphics is just general character view (full-body and head-only) and most of the other tips just describe graphical details (such as number of whiskers or toes etc.).

Does anyone get it?

share|improve this question

closed as too localized by FumbleFingers, tchrist, cornbread ninja 麵包忍者, StoneyB, MετάEd Jan 5 '13 at 19:31

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

I am assuming that the intended meaning behind the quote is

Think 'flow' when connecting the ear to the head.

It seems like an illustrative phrase, which would imply that you are supposed to have the idea of "flowing" in your head as you work on that particular part. In other words, the ear should flow into the head (or vice versa). It is telling you to avoid a "harsh" ear-to-head connection.

share|improve this answer
Mmm, this actually makes sense, thank you! I thought about something like "you should mind air flow in motion of ears", but it'd be totally unclear from the original statement. I've also tried to find a colloquial meaning of 'flow', but failed; so anyway, your version is the first sane one so far. – Alexander Shchegolev Jan 4 '13 at 17:03

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.