English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I saw him cross the road.

Is cross the road the object of saw? Or is it the complement of him?

share|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

In this sentence, to cross the road is an objective predicative complement within the sentence.

Such phrases take the general form:


The object here is clearly him.

Side note

As far as I'm aware, the "objective complement" is a rather peculiar construct to the English language. Other European languages (I can vouch for French and Spanish at least) require a separate clause, something akin to I saw that he crossed the road. (Also perfectly grammatical English, but less natural.)

share|improve this answer

A verb (cross) cannot be the object.

Break the statement into smaller pieces and the true object becomes more obvious:

I saw him

'I' subject, 'saw' verb, 'him' accusative object

he crossed the road

crossing is a separate activity to the seeing

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.