English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

He has an audacity that those who know him either adore or despise. His audacity is _____ .

There's only two kinds of people: those who love olives and those who hate it. Olives have a _____ flavor.

share|improve this question
Shibbolethic? – jwpat7 Jan 3 '13 at 18:08
All-or-nothing? Binary? Bipolar? – Mitch Jan 3 '13 at 18:52
up vote 6 down vote accepted

I would say:

His audacity is polarising.

Olives are polarising when it comes to favour.

share|improve this answer
I can't go with this usage in OP's specific instance. There's not a single instance of olives are polarising in Google Books (nor with the American polarizing). There's not even one for the archetypal Marmite is polarising. – FumbleFingers Jan 3 '13 at 18:34

Technically speaking, Dohn Joe's polarising "ought" to be the right word here - and you might just get away with it in OP's first example, but it seems a somewhat quirky usage to me.

But in practice people would probably use divisive in the first case, and some more roundabout expression for the second. If it weren't for the preceding sentence, I personally would go for...

Olives have a "love it or hate it" flavour. (often written as love-it-or-hate-it).

share|improve this answer

Marmitey. As referring to marmite of which has the slogan "you either love it or hate it. Its a colloquialism but it fits well.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.