English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Possible Duplicate:
How to use “who” vs. “that”
‘Which’ applied to brute animals

Is the use of "who", as applied to non-human animals, ever considered grammatically correct? Would it be correct to refer to a cat as "the same cat who I saw yesterday" instead of "the cat that I saw yesterday", or is this considered incorrect?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by MετάEd, jwpat7, Bill Franke, waiwai933 Jan 3 '13 at 7:32

This question was marked as an exact duplicate of an existing question.

As a side-note, I think this grammatical issue might be contentious among some animal rights advocates. :) – Anderson Green Jan 3 '13 at 6:25
I have also seen phrases like "the person that I saw yesterday" being used in colloquial and informal English, instead of "the person who I saw yesterday". – Anderson Green Jan 3 '13 at 6:27
@MετάEd This question addresses one specific case of that question, which addresses a much broader issue. Is it still considered a duplicate? – Anderson Green Jan 3 '13 at 6:32
The answer to the broader question answers your question also. In my view that makes your question useful primarily as a duplicate question (a pointer to the broader question). – MετάEd Jan 3 '13 at 6:34
If you want to get technical about it, it should be "the person whom I saw yesterday". But the language doesn't support that anymore. Using "that" instead of "who" is an ancient tradition, and as much as I dislike it, there's nothing that can be done about it. Suck it up and don't use it if you don't like it, but rest assured that others will. – user21497 Jan 3 '13 at 6:47

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.