Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I would like a polite (formal) way to say:

The changes you intend to make will not do us any good.

or should I say "intend on making"?

share|improve this question
1  
There's also The changes you are intent on making..., which is probably the least "polite" way of putting it. –  FumbleFingers Jan 2 '13 at 17:48
add comment

4 Answers

You could say:

"We feel that the intended changes will be of little benefit."

This avoids directly saying "you", which could come across as impolite.

Although not quite the same, you could also use "the proposed changes".

share|improve this answer
    
Thnak you, that's perfect! –  Nniiss Jan 2 '13 at 17:09
3  
@Nniiss: Strictly speaking, the fact that you're apparently happy with a rephrasing suggests your question is effectively Off Topic "style advice/proofreading". This answer makes no attempt to address the question you appeared to ask, about any possible difference between intend on making,intend to make –  FumbleFingers Jan 2 '13 at 17:44
    
I wasn't sure how to put it.. I just created my acc –  Nniiss Jan 2 '13 at 18:10
    
@FumbleFingers I answered her first question. –  James Jan 2 '13 at 19:05
    
@FumbleFingers Also my question was edited by Matt Эллен –  Nniiss Jan 2 '13 at 19:16
show 1 more comment

Apparently, intend on is a common error in English usage:

You can plan on doing something, but you intend to do it. Many people confuse these two expressions with each other and mistakenly say “intend on”*. Of course if you are really determined, you can be intent on doing something.

share|improve this answer
    
wow I had no idea. Thank you! –  Nniiss Jan 2 '13 at 19:46
    
I don't agree that to intend on [doing something] is an erroneous/ungrammatical form caused by conflation of intent on/intend to. As you say, you can plan on doing something, so there's nothing apart from convention to stop you intending on doing it. And since I intend on has been around for centuries, I suggest it's well-established enough to be considered a "standard" grammatical form. –  FumbleFingers Jan 2 '13 at 20:41
    
@FumbleFingers: But it's not included in the dictionary (at least not in the famous ones that I checked) and your search yielded 19k results only. I still think it's a common error. –  Gigili Jan 3 '13 at 6:20
    
Yeah, well I reckon on calling it a day then. I'm not about to concede that I'm an incompetent speaker, and you obviously think intend has some special quality distinguishing it from words like plan, reckon in such constructions, so I don't think either of us is about to change our minds. :) –  FumbleFingers Jan 3 '13 at 13:26
add comment

Notice that the first answer suggests several different improvements, each of which makes it more polite:

(a) It replaces the stark "not do... good" with the softer "little benefit" (which avoids "no" or "not").

(b) "Any" is often added for emphasis, so "not... ANY good" means especially worthless! On the other hand, "will not do us good" sounds awkward.

(c) It adds "We feel that..." which makes it an opinion rather than an absolute (even though it's about benefit to us, so it works out as absolute). Any time you qualify a statement with "in my opinion" you are being a bit more polite.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Perhaps something like this would be more polite:

I don't understand how these proposed changes will help you or me.

share|improve this answer
    
yeah, but in a formal letter directly saying "you" could come across as impolite. –  Nniiss Jan 3 '13 at 19:01
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.