Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am confused about using transitive and intransitive verbs for making passive sentences. Especially when that verb can be both (like the verb change).

share|improve this question
    
Could you cast that as a question? –  gmcgath Dec 30 '12 at 0:05

2 Answers 2

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Change is one of a number of ergative verbs in English. These are used in both transitive and intransitive senses:

  • In the transitive sense, the Agent is the subject of the verb and acts upon a Patient, the direct object.

    John (Agent, subject) broke the window (Patient, direct object).
    Mary (Agent, subject) walked the dog (Patient, direct object).
    This book (Agent, subject) changed my life (Patient, direct object)

  • In the intransitive sense, the Agent is deleted and the Patient becomes the subject of the verb, which thus represents the action as “performed” by the Patient.

    The window (Patient, subject) broke.
    The dog (Patient, subject) walked.
    My life (Patient, subject) changed.

As you know, only transitive verbs can be cast into the passive, but the effect is very similar — the Patient becomes the subject. In a passive construction, however, the Agent may be restored as the object of a prepositional phrase with by:

The window (Patient, subject) was broken by John (Agent).
The dog (Patient, subject) was walked by Mary (Agent).
My life (Patient, subject) was changed by this book (Agent).

Ergative verbs mostly designate a change of state, and there is often very little difference, if any, in meaning between the transitive and intransitive versions. The same outcome is described, and the difference is largely one of focus — the transitive sense puts the emphasis on the Agent, the intransitive sense puts the emphasis on the outcome and ignores the Agent altogether.

Tom boiled water.       The water boiled.
This book changed my life.    My life changed.

However, there is substantially more difference when the Patient is animate and the verb designates a change which the Patient is capable of effecting by its own effort:

Mary walked the dog through the park.   The dog walked through the park.
Lee moved Stuart to the left wing.      Stuart moved to the left wing.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you for you good and complete answer –  yaa110 Dec 29 '12 at 16:11

Verbs can form passives only when they are used transitively. The active sentence The government changed the law is transitive, and so allows the passive construction The law has been changed by the government. On the other hand, You have changed a lot over the past ten years is intransitive when it means that the person addressed has a different appearance, and so does not allow a passive form.

share|improve this answer
    
For Example: When I got Married, my life was changed or When I got Married, my life changed ??? this is my question. –  yaa110 Dec 29 '12 at 12:20
    
I think im my example the second one is true, am I right? –  yaa110 Dec 29 '12 at 12:32
    
@Andrew Leach. Something got lost in transferring my answer from MS Word. Now corrected. –  Barrie England Dec 29 '12 at 13:01
    
@yaa110. When I got married, my life was changed and When I got married, my life changed are both possible English sentences. In the first, changed is the past participle of change and is used with was to make a passive construction. In the second, changed is the past tense of change and is used intransitively. –  Barrie England Dec 29 '12 at 13:05
    
do my examples have the same meaning? –  yaa110 Dec 29 '12 at 13:49

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.