English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Please consider the sentences below:

The grass was glittering with dew.
The grass was glistening with dew.
The grass was glinting with dew.
The grass was gleaming with dew.

Below are the definitions given by my dictionary.

Glisten = (of something wet or greasy) shine with a sparkling light.
Glitter = shine with a bright, shimmering reflected light.
Glint = give out or reflect small flashes of light.
Gleam = shine brightly, especially with reflected light.

I know that even if two words are synonyms, they can imply different meanings, even when the dictionary definitions look almost identical (as they do here). Are there any such differences between the implied meanings of the example sentences above?

share|improve this question
How could you have left out glistering and glowing — not to mention shining, sparkling, twinkling, spangling, scintillating, and coruscating? – tchrist Dec 24 '12 at 2:28
Like it or not, these types of questions are specifically ALLOWED on this site. Please, please, please, stop closing them. (And the fact that there are other near-synonyms that the OP could have listed is totally irrelevant. She didn't ask about those because she doesn't need to know about them.) – Marthaª Dec 24 '12 at 3:38
I feel like this is a definite case of "a picture is worth a thousand words", but I have neither the time nor the expertise to create such pictures. :/ – Marthaª Dec 24 '12 at 3:38
@Marthaª: I don't completely agree that other near-synonyms are irrelevant. In a question like this, I'm usually left wondering, "Why these four words, and not others?" In other words, I think the O.P. could further improve such questions if some hint of context or purpose was provided. (That all said, I'm sticking with your exhortation, and not voting negatively, but opting to post pictures instead.) – J.R. Dec 24 '12 at 11:45
There is a concept called semantic trait that comes into play here. Often, native speakers masters these unconsciously. Then, there is the issue of Latin versus Greek origin for what are basicially synonyms. And I am sorry but don't feel like applying my brain power to this. It would take pages and pages. One example: glinting is usually about a hard surface, ergo, I would not use it here to describe the relationship with how the dew looked on the grass. So, if grass is glinting with dew, the writer is viewing the grass as a hard surface... – Lambie Jan 28 at 17:27

There's not much of a difference between any of the words in that sentence, and indeed they are all very similar in general. If I were to assign shades of meaning to them, I'd probably break it down like this, more or less in decreasing order of brightness/eye-catchingness:

Glitter: a bright, shiny sparkle that twinkles rapidly.

Glisten: a soft, less-pronounced sparkle with occasional twinkles.

Gleam: a continuous soft shine with occasional twinkles of additional brightness.

Glint: a single twinkle or sparkle.

In regard to your example sentence, I'd say "glittered" is probably the most fitting since there is a lot of grass and a lot of individual dew drops, each of which can catch the light and cause a twinkle, so the overall effect would be a lot of small, rapid twinkles.

share|improve this answer
I tend to think that hard shiny objects glitter. Things that are wet glisten. – Jim Dec 24 '12 at 4:38

I prefer your second sentence. Simply change the word "glistening" to "glistened".

--The grass glistened with dew.

share|improve this answer

I like the first two words (glistening & glittering), as well as tchrist's shining.

Glittering might be especially apt if the dew was causing several individual points of light, as if glitter had been spread across the lawn.

I'm not so fond of glinting, perhaps because I often associate it with someone's eyes. NOAD lists this definition:

• (of a person's eyes) shine with a particular emotion : his eyes glinted angrily.

That said, the word's primary meaning is "give out or reflect small flashes of light," so it could be used in the dewy grass sentence.

Similarly, there's nothing wrong with gleam per se, but NOAD lists these definitions:

• (of a smooth surface or object) reflect light because well polished : Victor buffed the glass until it gleamed | [as adj] (gleaming) sleek and gleaming black limousines.
• (of an emotion or quality) appear or be expressed through the brightness of someone's eyes or expression : a hint of mischief gleaming in her eyes.

Since grass is not well-polished, and there are also more ties to eyes and emotions, I'd steer away from gleam as well.

As a general rule, it's worth examining secondary and tertiary definitions of words when trying to learn about how synonyms differ. Those additional meanings will sometimes – though not always – hold the keys to understanding why some words may sound a bit more out of place than others in certain contexts.

As for Martha's comments about pictures being worth a thousand words, that's another technique you can use. For example, I found these pictures using the Google image search:

gleaming grass glinting grass
glistening grass glittering grass

I found these four images by typing (from top to bottom): "gleaming grass", "glinting grass", "glistening grass", and "glittering grass" into the Google image search bar. As you can see, the terms are largely interchangeable in this context. In fact, one of the pictures was captioned "magical atmosphere of the glittering and gleaming carpet in the grass," as if one adjective wasn't entirely sufficient.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.