Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I know that the symbol "-" can be read as hyphen or dash. While I am reading aloud "Figure 8-1" or "Section 8-1", what is the correct name for "-"?

Sometimes, I heard people read it as

  • figure eight dash one
  • figure eight point one

but those both sound strange to me.

share|improve this question
    
Although the function of the symbol is really that of a hyphen in this usage, it is read as dash (or, as Barrie answers, often omitted). It is a device well known to rail fans in America, where the Dash 7, Dash 8 and Dash 9 series of GE diesel-electric locomotives (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GE_Dash_9-44CW ) were denied more prestigious names. Rail fans soon got used to the strange nicknames, which sounded rather - er - dashing. One assumes that reading the hyphens as hyphen would sound ultra-strange. –  Edwin Ashworth Dec 23 '12 at 7:45
    
In the movie Brazil we hear a pronunciation like 'eight stroke one' ... I assumed that was a British way of saying it, but have no further evidence. –  GEdgar Dec 23 '12 at 13:37
    
@EdwinAshworth What do you mean it functions as a hyphen? It does not: it functions as a dash, separating two unlike things, not like a hyphen to join them. –  tchrist Dec 23 '12 at 14:02
    
I'd read this as either "Figure eight one," or "Figure eight dash one." I can't say with 100% certainty, but I believe anyone who reads "8-1" as "eight point one" would only do so because they're already familiar with similar publications that use the "8.1" format. In other words, "Eight point one" is a ‘holdover’ that's technically incorrect for "8-1", although only a pedant would bother to interrupt with a correction, because it's rather obvious what is meant. –  J.R. Dec 23 '12 at 16:08
    
@tchrist: it functions as a hyphen in that it combines two sub-classifications into a binomial. This is reminiscent of double-barrelled names, but if you wish to argue that 8 is higher hierarchically than 1 in 8-1 here (and I would agree), one could compare dog-fox which is a type of fox, not dog, fox thus being the head. Things are often like in some aspects and unlike in others. Here, 8 and 1 are being used primarily as identifiers. –  Edwin Ashworth Dec 24 '12 at 21:49

1 Answer 1

Unless there is any risk of ambiguity in the particular context, it seems enough to me to say section eight one.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.