Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

There was a question recently about comparatives and it got me thinking about how comparatives are formed.

There are those that take -er and those that use more to indicate comparison, but is worse the only comparative in English that is intrinsically comparative? That is, it is not necessary to modify it by adding a suffix or a helper.

Why is this the case? Looking at Etymonline seems to indicate that it came into English as a comparative already, which would I think explain its irregular form, but I don't know enough about etymology to know if that is a good guess. Are there other words like this, or is worse unique?

share|improve this question
    
I've been holding out accepting an answer because both just offer a single counterexample and neither one has anything to say with regard to the last paragraph asking about the why. However, it seems we have a question about suppletion that has as good an answer as any with regard to the why of these irregularities, so I thought I would include it here. –  KitFox Dec 31 '12 at 12:19
    
Aren't "superior to" and "inferior to" comparatives? Nether uses -er or more. –  Sven Yargs Mar 9 '13 at 2:24
add comment

2 Answers

Much/many, more, most and little/few, less/fewer, least/fewest are the positive, comparative, and superlative quantifiers in English. They come in two scales, with affirmative and negative increments.

Note that the negative scale distinguishes count (few, fewer, fewest) from mass (little, less, least) consistently, while the affirmative scale does so only in the positive degree (much, many); more and most don't distinguish mass from count - fewer people, less cheese; more people, more cheese.

share|improve this answer
    
So more = more and fewer = with an -er, but less is different too. So is it just worse and less then? –  KitFox Dec 21 '12 at 18:03
    
+1 for the insightful note on fewer/less –  Alok Dec 21 '12 at 19:46
add comment

It's not unique. "Less" is a valid comparative of "little."

share|improve this answer
2  
I thought the comparative of little was littler. –  KitFox Dec 21 '12 at 17:56
    
@KitFox The comparative of I have little interest in X is I have less interest in A than I have in B. The superlative is I have the least interest of all of us. –  tchrist Dec 21 '12 at 22:01
    
I think most people would say smaller instead of littler. –  A.Ellett Dec 21 '12 at 22:54
    
@KitFox "Littler" is the comparative when you're talking about size. "Less" is the comparative when you're talking about degree. –  gmcgath Dec 22 '12 at 13:51
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.