Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Hey, I'm watching a TV show, and there's a sentence:

I knew giving you that book was gonna come back and bite me in the ass.

Can I change it to:

I know gave you that book was gonna come back and bite me in the ass.

share|improve this question
1  
You can change it to that, but, it would be grammatically incorrect then... ;-) –  Josh Jan 21 '11 at 3:46

3 Answers 3

up vote 4 down vote accepted

No. The phrase "giving you that book" is the subject of the clause.

share|improve this answer
    
+1 The clause is "[Subject] was gonna come back and bite me in the ass.", where [Subject] is "giving you that book". –  b.roth Jan 21 '11 at 11:55

I guess you are thinking that "knew giving" is some funny sort of compound verb, and wanting to move the past tense within it; but that's not how the sentence is structured. There is an omitted "that" (which can often be done in colloquial English), so the structure is:

"I knew [that [giving you that book] was ... ]"

share|improve this answer

I think most of us are inclined to say that "gave" makes the sentence ungrammatical. However, from a linguistic standpoint, we probably all understood what was meant, so it doesn't really matter which is used.

share|improve this answer
    
If I met the second sentence without the context of the first sentence to explain it, I would have a very hard time figuring out what was going on. Also I am very opposed to the idea that "as long as it's understandable it doesn't matter if it's 'right' or not." Saying it right makes it much more understandable. –  Hellion Jun 6 '11 at 3:35

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.