Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Why can we say:

It is worth more than. . . .

but not:

It is expensive more than. . . .

It’s the position of more which I find so confusing.

Also, is worth an adjective in both these cases?

share|improve this question
5  
5  
The simple answer is that expensive is an adjective and worth is not: we don't say "That's worth!" or "a worth watch" as we say "That's expensive!" or "an expensive watch". What exactly worth is is beyond me; it started as a noun; perhaps it's a preposition, as some answers in @tchrist's link suggest (but that seems very far-fetched to me). I'd call it, here at least, a component of a verbal phrase "to be worth", meaning "to cost"; which is a fancy way of saying It Is What It Is. –  StoneyB Dec 18 '12 at 2:58
    
@StoneyB This is actually a better link: english.stackexchange.com/a/83946/2085 –  tchrist Dec 18 '12 at 2:58
    
@tchrist A transitive adjective. Wow! I love this language. Colin, the question will probably be closed as an Exact Duplicate; but thank you for raising it. I don't know if you learned anything useful, but I did. –  StoneyB Dec 18 '12 at 3:06

2 Answers 2

Expensive is behaving as a typical adjective, which are only modified by preceding degree words, e.g.

It was more expensive than...
It was more sudden than...
It was more amazing than...

If we pretend for a moment that is worth was a verb, we could compare it with some other verbs of measuring activites, e.g.

It weighs more than...
The room seats more people than...
It measures more than...
It costs more than...

The phrase is worth behaves likes a stative verb. The only other comparable phrase I can think of is [be] up/down as in:

The Lions are down three points.
The Lions are up more than the Bears were up at this point last week.

If worth is an adjective, then it is one which is almost always restricted to being a predicative adjective. This is how Oxford English Dictionary (OED) describes it, noting that it is used

Almost always (now only) in predicative use, or following the n. as part of a qualifying phrase.

What is interesting is that although an expression like

*Gold is more worth than silver.

with a preceding degree word, would be usually considered ungrammatical, there are several attestations listed in OED of exactly such a usage (where a degree word precedes worth) from the Early Modern English period:

1568 Newe Comedie Jacob & Esau ii. iv. C iv b, Ah sir, when one is hungry, good meat is much worth.
1581 G. Pettie tr. S. Guazzo Ciuile Conuersat. (1586) iii. 138 It may rightly be saide..that the feathers are more worth then the byrde.
1615 W. Lawson Country Housewifes Garden (1626) 6 Fruit blown vnripe, are small worth.

I'd say worth is an unusual word, and has only become more unusual in recent history.

share|improve this answer

Worth is a difficult word.

For example

"The categorial status of worth is a matter of some dispute. It has variously been claimed to be a preposition and an adjective (cf. Maling 1983 and McCawley 1985). If it is a preposition, then it must have a homophonous derived noun, since phrases like the worth of the book are common enough. On the other hand, if it is an adjective, then it must be transitive, since it has a complement; this is surely unusual -- or even impossible, according to some theories of grammatical categories.

"Let it stand that no matter what category worth may belong to, it is an atypical example of the category."

In this particular case, worth is behaving transitively, since it has a complement with a comparative construction: more than . . . .

Expensive, on the other hand, is an ordinary adjective and has to be either a predicate adjective

  • That necklace is more expensive than she can afford.

or an attributive adjective

  • She didn't buy that expensive necklace.

And the comparative construction places adjectives after more, not before more.

share|improve this answer
1  
As @jlovegren says, usage has changed relatively recently. I must admit that, A man is of more worth than a beast sounds a bit Victorian, but only a bit. Of course, without the "of" it would sound a lot more Victorian. –  FumbleFingers Dec 18 '12 at 4:04

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.