English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

As a marketing slogan could the following sentence be considered grammatical?

Because happy customers are gold for your business.

Would it be better to say to instead of for? Or a rephrasing like:

Because happy customers are their weight worth in gold to your business.

share|improve this question

closed as too localized by RiMMER, coleopterist, FumbleFingers, Mark Beadles, Robusto Dec 14 '12 at 16:23

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

up vote 1 down vote accepted
  1. It’s customers, not costumers.
  2. The first is grammatical, but it’s not a very original or persuasive slogan.
  3. The expression in the second is worth their weight in gold and not their weight worth in gold.
  4. I’d try to come up with something different altogether, if I were you.
share|improve this answer
Thanks. You are probably right that I should try to come up with something more original... – agibsen Dec 14 '12 at 13:57
Better still, pay money and hire a professional. If a job is worth doing, it's worth doing well; and if it's worth doing well, it's worth paying someone who knows how to do it. – Robusto Dec 14 '12 at 14:04

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.