Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What is the correct way of saying "decision has been made on a paper"?

I review papers submitted by officials. Is it OK to say it like this?

This paper has already been decision by Sam Rick.

I am looking for a formal way to convey this message.

share|improve this question
    
Is Sam Rick the only person involved in making a decision regarding this paper? –  tylerharms Dec 12 '12 at 18:52
    
You might be interested in our proposed sister site for English language learners. You can support it by committing. Thank you. –  RegDwigнt Dec 13 '12 at 11:45
add comment

closed as off topic by MετάEd, Robusto, tchrist, Matt Эллен, RegDwigнt Dec 13 '12 at 11:44

Questions on English Language & Usage Stack Exchange are expected to relate to English language and usage within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

3 Answers

up vote 7 down vote accepted

I'm not sure whether you want:

This paper has already been reviewed by Sam Rick.

Or

A decision on this paper has already been made by Sam Rick.

share|improve this answer
    
Off topic (critique request). –  MετάEd Dec 13 '12 at 1:39
add comment

Assuming OP's intended sense is that Sam Rick has already made the decision, it's theoretically possible to say...

This paper has already been decided upon by Sam Rick.

...but in practice we don't normally use that form. I think if it's important to emphasise that a decision was actually made (as opposed to simply saying Rick reviewed the paper), we'd say...

This paper has already been pronounced upon by Sam Rick. (or assessed, evaluated, etc.)

share|improve this answer
add comment

The "by Sam Rick" part makes every construction sound a little odd, like Sam Rick is speaking about himself in third person (probably not), or Sam Rick's assistant is writing his emails. Either way, I would put the sentence in active voice and say,

Sam Rick has already reached his decision on this paper.

share|improve this answer
1  
I think the problem with your rephrasing is it casts Rick as the "primary" agent (it would be a slightly odd form to use if there were in fact dozens of other people who could have decided). OP's looking for a way to express the "state" of the paper, not how to say what some (possibly irrelevant) individual might have done. –  FumbleFingers Dec 12 '12 at 18:50
    
@FumbleFingers: I think so, but then who is Sam Rick? Why not just say "A decision on this paper has already been reached." Passive with no subject makes the sentence about the state of the paper. –  tylerharms Dec 12 '12 at 18:55
    
Well, yes - of course you can "airbrush out" Sam Rick by saying, for example, "A decision on this paper has already been reached". I guess I just meant that since OP's example sentence is of the form "This paper has already been [subjected to some process]", we should look for a form of words that keeps as much as possible of his original structure. But there's nothing inherently wrong with your suggestion, obviously - unlike the one I put up as a "theoretical possibility", yours is both "natural phrasing" and has the benefit of using a variant of OP's specific word decision. –  FumbleFingers Dec 12 '12 at 21:53
    
...but I don't see anything odd about mentioning Sam Rick in any of these formulations. Perhaps there are hundreds of reviewers, and OP just happens to know the name of the particular one of his "co-workers" who dealt with the paper. –  FumbleFingers Dec 12 '12 at 21:56
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.