Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A comma is commonly used as a short form of the word and in newspaper headlines. In what other contexts is this convention common?

This question came to mind as I was trying to parse the following clause from “A Visit from St. Nicholas”. The comma between obstacle and mount seems like it must represent the word and.

As dry leaves before the wild hurricane fly,
When they meet with an obstacle, mount to the sky;
So up to the house-top the coursers they flew,
With the sleigh full of toys — and St. Nicholas too:

share|improve this question

3 Answers 3

up vote 3 down vote accepted

As it's poetry, I don't think it's entirely realistic to apply normal standard of deconstruction here.

Personally, I have no problem with the earlier version as quoted by OP (without the word "that"). Maybe Clement Clarke Moore didn't either - I don't know if it was his idea to change it, or some pettifogging editor/publisher. But it parses fine to me as...

As dry leaves before the wild hurricane fly,
[As dry leaves] [flying thusly] when they meet with an obstacle, mount to the sky;

The second line is just a poetic expansion/restatement of the first. Both describe how the leaves move, as referred to by "So" (In such a manner) on the next line. It's unnecessary (but not absolutely wrong) to include "that" (I could have included it before flying thusly too if I'd wanted).

I disagree with other answers saying "when they meet with an obstacle" is "parenthetical". You should be able to remove a parenthetical clause without radically affecting the sense of what remains, but obviously the whole reason the leaves "mount to the sky" is because they've come up against an obstacle. If there were no obstacle, they'd just bowl along close to the ground.

share|improve this answer
    
Did you really just say “thusly”? :( –  tchrist Dec 21 '12 at 5:11
    
@tchrist: I really don't like this one, but J.R.'s usage seems fine to me. I certainly don't mind being a little bit quirky now and then. Actually, I thought I'd seen you use it somewhere before, but presumably not. –  FumbleFingers Dec 21 '12 at 5:18
1  
Interesting that in this case the poetic expansion of repeating dry leaves produces the same meaning as an implicit and after fly. –  Edward Brey Dec 21 '12 at 11:53
    
@Edward: Indeed. That's why I upvoted your question as soon as I understood how and why you'd parsed it that way. Initially I wanted to parse the first comma as standing in for "and" (it took me a while to understand why you did that for the second). But it's a famous poem/bit of doggerel which I quite like, so I wasn't prepared to accept it was inherently structurally invalid. I suppose feasibly I'm wrong (I am disagreeing with two very competent answerers here), but I was somewhat surprised to see everyone apparently agreed with "parenthetical phrase" as in both earlier answers. –  FumbleFingers Dec 21 '12 at 17:36
    
All that is required of a parenthetical phrase is that it be grammatically (syntactically) independent of the rest of the sentence. Semantically, it obviously changes the overall meaning of the expression of which it is a part. "When they meet with an obstacle" affects the meaning of the sentence, but it's parenthetical. –  MετάEd Jan 2 '13 at 19:54

No, the comma between obstacle and mount doesn't represent and. When they meet with an obstacle is a parenthetical remark inserted for rhythm and meter as well as metaphorical value, so it has to be set off with commas. Put into normal sentence order, the sentence becomes: Just as dry leaves that meet an obstacle fly into the sky when they're being blown about in a hurricane, the reindeer flew up to the housetop with St. Nicholas and the sleigh full of toys. Too prosaic to be interesting, but that's one version of how the sentence runs in normal, boring expository prose.

In a list of three or more items, the commas stand for and: I bought peanut butter, bread, jelly, and bananas for lunch. The first two commas stand for and but the third stands for itself: the Oxford or serial comma, even though many writers can't stand it at all.

share|improve this answer
    
What about between adjectives? Were you using a shorthand for "normal and boring expository prose"? :-) –  Edward Brey Dec 12 '12 at 5:38
1  
Yes, there, too, it's a substitute for and. It has another meaning: "these two adjectives can be reversed without affecting the meaning". Most ADJs follow the order of ADJs rule, an intuitive ordering that native speakers of English acquire with the language. Some ADJs belong in the same slot, so they should be separated by a comma. In this S, however, using & not using a comma or and affects the meaning a bit: "normal boring EP" & "boring normal EP" focus on different aspects of EP. The 2nd ADJ is, in the writer's mind, a more inherent attribute of EP. –  user21497 Dec 12 '12 at 5:49
    
I don't follow the parsing where When they meet with an obstacle stands alone parenthetically. I see these subject/verb pairings: Leaves fly, They (leaves) meet and mount, and They (coursers) flew. If you don't conjoin meet and mount, what is the subject of mount? –  Edward Brey Dec 12 '12 at 5:51
    
The subject of mount is dry leaves. To fly and to mount to the sky are synonymous in the stanza. Both the leaves and the reindeer have to rise in (mount to) the sky to overcome the obstacle or get to the rooftop. The sentence can be rewritten in many ways: Dry leaves that meet an obstacle when they're being blown about in a hurricane fly into the sky. Like the dry leaves, the reindeer flew up to the housetop with St. Nicholas and the sleigh full of toys. –  user21497 Dec 12 '12 at 5:55
    
You can't write "Dry leaves meet, mount to the sky..." & make it mean "Dry leaves meet and mount to the sky...", which means that the dry leaves meet (bump/fly) into each other and then fly into the sky, but that's not what the original sentence means: The leaves meet an obstacle, eg, a wall, a house, an obelisk, a gravestone [In this S, the commas = or]. "Dry leaves meet an obstacle and then they mount to the sky...". Meet is a transitive verb that requires a direct object; mount is intransitive and takes the PP complement to the sky. –  user21497 Dec 12 '12 at 6:03

The comma after obstacle does not stand for the word and. The phrase “when they meet with an obstacle” is parenthetical* and is marked front and back with commas.

The inverted word order used in many places in the poem creates some confusion. Also complicating the issue is that early versions of the poem contain a grammatical error. Where you have:

As dry leaves before the wild hurricane fly,
When they meet with an obstacle, mount to the sky;
So up to the house-top the coursers they flew,

Later versions read:

As dry leaves that before the wild hurricane fly,
When they meet with an obstacle, mount to the sky;
So up to the house-top the coursers they flew,

It may help to see the text prosaically reordered and the parenthetical phrase marked with parentheses:

As dry leaves that … fly before the wild hurricane
… Mount to the sky (when they meet with an obstacle);
So … the coursers they flew up to the house-top,

Wikisource describes the poem’s history and reproduces the published variants of the text.¹

Footnotes

* This statement has been challenged, so here I explain why – though its absence would be detrimental to the meaning of the verse – the phrase “when they meet with an obstacle” is quite properly described as parenthetical: it interrupts the grammar of the sentence, and is set apart in print with commas as befits its importance.

The dictionary describes a parenthesis as “[a] word, phrase, or sentence, by way of comment or explanation, inserted in, or attached to, a sentence which would be grammatically complete without it [emphasis added]”.² That is, a parenthesis contributes to the semantics (meaning) of the sentence but interrupts and stands beside (independent of) the syntax (grammar, structure) of the sentence. Wikipedia derives the word from the Greek παρένθεσις, meaning “to place alongside of”.³

In print, a parenthesis is set apart from the enclosing sentence using punctuation. When it is not an important insertion, square brackets or curved lines called parentheses are commonly used; for greater importance or emphasis, commas or even dashes are used.

(Bold face is used in this note to mark parenthetical text.)

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.