Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Question: Occupational nouns (butcher, sailor, musician, etc.) have various suffixes in English (er, or, ee, ant, etc.). Is there a set of rules to form occupational nouns from the verbs or their object (butchering, sailing, etc.)?

Explanation: For example, what are the rules to go from this to this: Leadership / Leading ----> Leader ...And not 'Leadian'

In the same way, when we 'invent' occupational nouns, how do we know that some are more correct than others? For instance, how do we know that 'low-self-esteemer' sounds more correct than 'low-self-esteemian'?

I have considered finding a regular expression part of speech tagger to give me a list of noun constructions. However, these do not have a separate category for 'occupation nouns'. More importantly still, they would not explain the rules for forming occupational nouns from verbs/objects, but only for identifying them.

So where are the rules for forming occupational nouns from verbs or objects?

share|improve this question
6  
-er vs. -or have been covered before. Several times over, in fact, as you can see by browsing the agent-noun-suffix tag. -ian is a separate story, but as you can see from the dictionary entry, it's not an agent noun suffix to begin with. A musician is not someone who musics, a lesbian is not someone who lesbs, and a Colombian is not someone who colombs. Likewise, a leadian would be someone related to lead; not someone who leads. –  RegDwigнt Dec 11 '12 at 23:06
    
And a farrier is not someone who "farries", nor is a haberdasher someone who "haberdashes". –  FumbleFingers Dec 12 '12 at 0:46
1  
And a finger is not someone who fings. Nor is a costermonger someone who costermongs (or costmongs). And an accordion is not something that accords. –  Robusto Dec 12 '12 at 2:33
2  
@Robusto: I know you are cracking jokes, but as a courtesy to future readers who might not realize that: yours is precisely my point. The -er in finger (from P.Gmc. fingraz) is not an agent noun suffix, either. Neither is the first -er in costermonger (see costard); the second actually is (monger, formerly manger, comes from the now-obsolete verb mangian, "to traffic, trade"). –  RegDwigнt Dec 12 '12 at 9:43
2  
@Robusto The chords on the bass side of a modern accordion do accord, hence the name: The oldest name for this group of instruments is actually harmonika, from the Greek harmonikos, meaning harmonic, musical. Today, native versions of the name accordion are more common. These names are a reference to the type of accordion patented by Cyrill Demian, which concerned "automatically coupled chords on the bass side" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accordion –  Michael Paulukonis Dec 13 '12 at 19:54
show 4 more comments

1 Answer

An occupational noun derived from a verb usually ends in -er or -or and means "one who does [verb]". E.g.: jumper, eater, runner, walker, sailor etc.

An occupational noun that is derived from another noun will usually end in -ian. For example, librarian is derived from the noun library; there is no verb to library.

You could say that occupational nouns that end in -ian mean something like "one who works at/for/with [noun]". For example, a musician is "one who works with music" (not "one who musics" because there is no verb to music).

There are exceptions, but I think this is a good rule of thumb.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.