English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Given this sentence, the that feels unnecessary:

If I believed that I were in a position to do so, I would.

I find these seemingly spurious instances of that working their way into my prose all the time.

Another example where it seems unnecessary:

I've been around people so critical that I ceased hearing them.

My question is: What is the grammatical basis determining where that is appropriate in sentences like these?

share|improve this question
You must have been a French speaker in a former life. Me too. Only I don't think all those "that"s are necessarily spurious. The first one is optional and was should be were, but the second one isn't optional for me: the sentence sounds incomplete to me without it. I'll wager that most native speakers will call both optional, though. So many sloppy speakers and writers produce sloppy, slippery English. – user21497 Dec 8 '12 at 14:38
Yeah, the was/were sentence is from a quick draft [fixed]. Mea culpa. I wish I were a French speaker in this life! – Chris Dec 8 '12 at 14:41
It's easy enough to learn French. Start now! – user21497 Dec 8 '12 at 14:43
To the editor: style guides differ when it comes to the capitalization of an independent clause following a colon. Just sayin'. – Chris Dec 8 '12 at 16:14
You're right about that. But we all have our biases and preferences, so you have to be prepared for that kind of edit here. 'Shappened to me a few times too. – user21497 Dec 9 '12 at 0:59

We can omit that in all positions, except when the that goes at the beginning of a sentence . . . or when the that-clause comes after an abstract noun . . . We usually omit that in speech.

‘An A-Z of English Grammar and Usage’ by Leech and others.

In relative clauses, that is usually omitted unless it is the subject.

If I were and if I was are both grammatical in British English, but not, apparently, in American English.

share|improve this answer
That's pretty close to everything. There are reasons for this behavior, but they're much more complex. – John Lawler Dec 8 '12 at 15:49
So, the "the nothing that was there" is grammatically sound and the "that" in my example sentences should both be omitted? – Chris Dec 8 '12 at 16:10
@JohnLawler Go on, then. – Andrew Leach Dec 8 '12 at 16:22
@Chris. Can be rather than should be. – Barrie England Dec 8 '12 at 16:48
@Chris: No, that in your examples may be deleted. There is no should involved -- Complementizer that is optional in this configuration, is all. Relative marker that has other optional configurations, but this isn't one of them, because it's not a relative clause. – John Lawler Dec 8 '12 at 16:51

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.