Take the 2-minute tour ×
English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Do we say "Without reason" or "Without reasons"? (e.g. She started laughing without (apparent) reason(s).).

Is "reason" countable or not?

Can we ever use a plural noun after "without"?

share|improve this question

7 Answers 7

up vote 5 down vote accepted

In the phrase "without reason", reason is a noun. Reasons can be counted so "without reasons" is grammatical. However, it is not idiomatic; the English idiom is to use "without reason". Note also that this is a formal usage which is uncommon in everyday conversation:

She laughed without reason (formal register)

contrasted with

She started laughing for no apparent reason (informal, everyday register)

share|improve this answer

I think "without any reason" is much better, because "she started laughing without reason" means she started laughing without logic, but "without any reason" means without any cause.

share|improve this answer

"Reason" is certainly a count noun. However, it is also a verb. In the sentence "She started laughing without reason" could mean either "she didn't have a reason to start laughing", or "she starting laughing without thinking about it." In the first example, it is a noun, in the second it is a verb.

The most common way is to say "bla bla bla... without reason", and it is would probably be the countable noun, most of the time, but is slightly ambiguous. It would be perfectly fine for you to say, "she started laughing without reasons". It is grammatically correct, just not the most common way of putting it - which is probably a good thing.

So, to answer, your question: "Yes."

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks. I can't vote you up, since I don't have enough reputation yet. –  augustin Aug 15 '10 at 9:47
    
Don't worry. Keep asking questions, and your reputation will increase :-) –  Vincent McNabb Aug 15 '10 at 10:17
2  
This answer is wrong, so it's another one to add to the long and unfortunate list of incorrect and yet upvoted and accepted answers. Find me one single example of "without" followed by a verb in its plain form: "I left the house without eat breakfast", "He came without bring his coat" etc. Never, never, never. Also the word you are looking for is "idiom". –  delete Aug 25 '10 at 4:19
1  
It couldn't be a verb in this case. If it were a verb, it would be in the gerund, i.e. "She started laughing without reasoning". Other examples: "He entered the room without saying a word", "He gave us a signal without the teacher noticing". –  b.roth Aug 25 '10 at 9:22

Googlefight says 103.000 hits for "without reason" and only 6.670 hits for "without reasons": http://www.googlefight.com/index.php?lang=en_GB&word1=%22without+reason%22&word2=%22without+reasons%22

share|improve this answer

It is without reason. Reasons is used in sentences like the prime minister resigned for personal reasons.

The New Oxford American Dictionary reports also the following phrases:

  • beyond all reason (he indulged Michael beyond all reason).
  • by reason of (persons who, by reason of age, are in need of care).
  • for some reason (for some reason she likes you).
  • listen to reason (the child is usually too emotionally overwrought to listen to reason).
  • it stands to reason (it stands to reason that if you can eradicate the fear, the nervousness will subside).
share|improve this answer

reason most definitely can be countable: "give me five reasons why it isn't", but it can also be uncountable, "Reason is Man's greatest ally". Which are we dealing with? We can't quite pin it on without either; off the top of my head, "life is awful without friends" or "you can't do that without grounds to do so".

To my ear, making reason plural is unquestionably wrong.

*She started laughing without (apparent) reasons.

She started laughing without (apparent) reason.

I can't think of a single grammatical ground for invalidating the first. The fact that we can find other instances of without and a plural noun should prove it possible. Despite this,it is simply not said. I don't think you wouldn't be understood if you said it, but it would raise eyebrows and red pens. This isn't really an idiomatic phrase, perhaps in use, but not in the sense of compositionally; there is certainly something to be had from the meaning of just these words.

I am assuming here that we're after the without reason that means something like "without justification". The OED suggests that this meaning comes from the Middle French sans raison, from the Old French sanz reisun—the first recored use was in a1387. I'm no expert in French, but Google translates this as unjustifiably, which seems like a good start. I'd be interested to hear the modern version from a native speaker.

This construction is not without companions. Compare to:

without rhyme or reason

without reason or measure

without friendship/companionship, justification

There are other examples; these things do exist. It's almost as if these things, especially in the abstract, exist beyond count. Also compare, "she said it without justification" not *"she said it without justifications", but "she said it without grounds" not *"she said it without ground". In cases like without reason, the plural is unnecessary and muddles the meaning. I'm stil not entirely sure why–input?

share|improve this answer

According to a COCA query americans say "without reason" 21 times more often than "without reasons". Statistically speaking She started laughing without reasons is odd. According to CALD reason is both countable and uncountable. Yes one can use a plural noun after "without". Again, a COCA query provides hundreds of hits for without followed by a plural noun.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.