English Language & Usage Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If I want to use lead to, does it always need to use being as shown below.

less number of points lead to missing edges being occurred, are recognized using proximity analysis.

share|improve this question
Is that intended to be a complete sentence? It doesn't make sense as it stands. I'd guess at [Using] a lower number of points will lead to a number of edges being missed; this will be picked up on by the use of proximity analysis. Lead to may be followed by a noun phrase or a structure containing an -ing-form: ...will lead to disaster // ...wil lead to some edges being missed. – Edwin Ashworth Nov 29 '12 at 19:28
@Edwin Ashworth: thank you for the comments. Actually I wanted to write the following meaning with the term lead to. "The cases where missing edges occur due to less number of points are recognized using proximity analysis". – gnp Nov 29 '12 at 20:49
"Fewer points" or "a smaller number of points" is correct. => "Cases in which there are missing edges occur because fewer points are recognized using proximity analysis". – user21497 Nov 29 '12 at 23:01
up vote 1 down vote accepted

One possible way to phrase your sentence(the complete one posted in the comments) using "lead to" is:

Proximity analysis recognizes cases in which fewer points lead to missing edges.

There are obviously many other ways to rephrase the sentence such as:

Fewer points lead to cases where edges are missed; however, these are recognized by proximity analysis.

I personally prefer the former over the latter.

share|improve this answer
The rephrase needs re-punctuating. – Edwin Ashworth Nov 30 '12 at 15:32
is it missing a comma before "however"? – superdemongob Nov 30 '12 at 16:08
A semi-colon, dash or full stop. – Edwin Ashworth Dec 1 '12 at 9:52
Thank you for correcting me there. Always eager to learn :D – superdemongob Dec 2 '12 at 9:49

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.